Re: [bcel] Backwards Incompatible Change to Visitor

2011-08-20 Thread Dave Brosius
Sebb is right... my mistake... apologies, and thanks for the fix. dave On 08/20/2011 09:15 PM, sebb wrote: On 17 August 2011 07:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, with svn revision 1158060 the bcel.generic.Visitor interface has become package private, breaking the Gump builds of Xalan XSLTC, comm

Re: [bcel] Backwards Incompatible Change to Visitor

2011-08-20 Thread sebb
On 17 August 2011 07:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > with svn revision 1158060 the bcel.generic.Visitor interface has become > package private, breaking the Gump builds of Xalan XSLTC, > commons-javaflow and likely other downstream code. > > Has this change been intentional? I don't think so.

Re: [bcel] Backwards Incompatible Change to Visitor

2011-08-17 Thread Torsten Curdt
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > with svn revision 1158060 the bcel.generic.Visitor interface has become > package private, breaking the Gump builds of Xalan XSLTC, > commons-javaflow and likely other downstream code. Gump is so cool :) cheers, Torsten --

[bcel] Backwards Incompatible Change to Visitor

2011-08-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, with svn revision 1158060 the bcel.generic.Visitor interface has become package private, breaking the Gump builds of Xalan XSLTC, commons-javaflow and likely other downstream code. Has this change been intentional? Stefan -