ok for me is enough to stop the discussion here, no needs to continue
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:40 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 21:29, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> That sounds be a case that the component needs to override
On 22 September 2011 21:29, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> That sounds be a case that the component needs to override the
> assembly-plugin configuration and define its own assembly descriptors
No.
I see no benefit in hiding the assembly descriptor contents in a jar.
They are not sufficiently standard
That sounds be a case that the component needs to override the
assembly-plugin configuration and define its own assembly descriptors
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 20:17, Simone Tripodi wrote
On 22 September 2011 20:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> for the components I've been touching, they create the same assemblies:
>
> * bin = LICENSE + NOTICE + RELEASE-NOTES + jar (+ dependencies) + javadoc
> * src = LICENSE + NOTICE + RELEASE-NOTES + src + pom
>
> wouldn't be wiser having a "least c
for the components I've been touching, they create the same assemblies:
* bin = LICENSE + NOTICE + RELEASE-NOTES + jar (+ dependencies) + javadoc
* src = LICENSE + NOTICE + RELEASE-NOTES + src + pom
wouldn't be wiser having a "least common multiple" - and override it
where needed, like daemon f
On 22 September 2011 19:44, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Seb,
> you got me, we distribute assemblies descriptors as jar, then define a
> default assembly-plugin configuration in the parent - components that
> need define their own assemblies, are still free to do it.
> If you don't see any blocking
Hi Seb,
you got me, we distribute assemblies descriptors as jar, then define a
default assembly-plugin configuration in the parent - components that
need define their own assemblies, are still free to do it.
If you don't see any blocking issue, I could start working on it.
Just let me know, have a
On 22 September 2011 18:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/22/11 7:17 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> al the components I have been touching (digester, discovery, chain,
>> functor, dbutils, pool2, graph, meiyo) have exactly the same assembly
>> descriptors and assembly plugin configuratio
On 22 September 2011 18:18, sebb wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 16:02, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Seb,
>>
>>>
>>> The parent POM currently only applies the assembly plugin when using
>>> the rc or release profiles.
>>> I assume this would not change?
>>>
>>> In which case, it cannot cause additio
On 9/22/11 7:17 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> al the components I have been touching (digester, discovery, chain,
> functor, dbutils, pool2, graph, meiyo) have exactly the same assembly
> descriptors and assembly plugin configuration.
>
> I honestly think that we could do a little step
On 22 September 2011 16:02, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Seb,
>
>>
>> The parent POM currently only applies the assembly plugin when using
>> the rc or release profiles.
>> I assume this would not change?
>>
>> In which case, it cannot cause additional for components that don't
>> use the profiles,
Hi Seb,
>
> The parent POM currently only applies the assembly plugin when using
> the rc or release profiles.
> I assume this would not change?
>
> In which case, it cannot cause additional for components that don't
> use the profiles, and any components that don't have assembly
> descriptors pre
On 22 September 2011 15:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> al the components I have been touching (digester, discovery, chain,
> functor, dbutils, pool2, graph, meiyo) have exactly the same assembly
> descriptors and assembly plugin configuration.
>
> I honestly think that we could do a li
Hi all guys,
al the components I have been touching (digester, discovery, chain,
functor, dbutils, pool2, graph, meiyo) have exactly the same assembly
descriptors and assembly plugin configuration.
I honestly think that we could do a little step of improvement and
remove that redundancy.
My propo
14 matches
Mail list logo
