Re: [logging] change groupId (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4))

2007-12-07 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, ...and we have a winner! I am a little late ;) Could you please change the groupId to "org.apache.commons.logging". It is an ugly legacy problem that many projects are still ignoring the maven conventions. Here ar

Re: [logging] change groupId (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4))

2007-12-06 Thread Simon Kitching
Joerg Hohwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Could you please change the groupId to "org.apache.commons.logging". > It is an ugly legacy problem that many projects are still ignoring the maven > conventions. > > Here are the good boys that have already been convinced: > http://repo1.maven.o

[logging] change groupId (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4))

2007-12-06 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, > ...and we have a winner! I am a little late ;) Could you please change the groupId to "org.apache.commons.logging". It is an ugly legacy problem that many projects are still ignoring the maven conventions. Here are the good boys that have

[RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-26 Thread Dennis Lundberg
...and we have a winner! The vote has passed with the following votes: +1 (binding): Torsten Curdt, Oliver Heger, Sebastian Bazley, Jörg Schaible, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non-binding at the time of his vote, but binding now): Ben Speakmon +1 (non-binding): Nicolas de Loof, I'm proceeding with t

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-26 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last go: - The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them - The manifests no longer mention Jakarta - [LOGGING-118] Generate source and binary archives. Release Notes: h

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-24 Thread sebb
On 24/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 23/11/2007, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >>> Yeah, I just noticed that as well. WTF! I am unable to reproduce it > >>> again, even with an exact copy of the files I built before.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-24 Thread Dennis Lundberg
sebb wrote: On 23/11/2007, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dennis Lundberg wrote: Yeah, I just noticed that as well. WTF! I am unable to reproduce it again, even with an exact copy of the files I built before. This is just the source distributions though, so no jars are present in them

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-24 Thread sebb
On 23/11/2007, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > Yeah, I just noticed that as well. WTF! I am unable to reproduce it > > again, even with an exact copy of the files I built before. > > > > This is just the source distributions though, so no jars are present in > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I had a look in JIRA for the assembly plugin and found this issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-222 It seems to fit the bill and is fixed in the 2.2-beta-2 release. Ben Speakmon wrote: Same thing (the 2.4-1 bit) happened to me when I was doing the email release. I wasn't able to re

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > Changes since the last go: > - The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them > - The manifests no longer mention Jakarta > - [LOGGING-118] Generate source and binary archives. > > R

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Yeah, I just noticed that as well. WTF! I am unable to reproduce it again, even with an exact copy of the files I built before. This is just the source distributions though, so no jars are present in them. Would it be OK if I repackage the -src.zip and -src.tar.gz files

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Ben Speakmon
Same thing (the 2.4-1 bit) happened to me when I was doing the email release. I wasn't able to repro it, so I didn't file a bug and wrote it off to cosmic rays. But obviously there's something strange going on. +1 nonbinding on the release, BTW. On Nov 22, 2007 1:54 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PR

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Yeah, I just noticed that as well. WTF! I am unable to reproduce it again, even with an exact copy of the files I built before. This is just the source distributions though, so no jars are present in them. Would it be OK if I repackage the -src.zip and -src.tar.gz files with the correct path a

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Oliver Heger wrote: Dennis Lundberg wrote: Oliver Heger wrote: +1 Some minor remarks (which are not too problematic IMO): - The format of the md5 files is a bit unusual. Other components typically use a format like f88520ed791673aed6cc4591bc058b55 *commons-logging-1.1.1-bin.zip I created

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Sorry, just noticed one more thing: The source distributions unpack in a directory "commons-logging-2.4.1-src". This version number is really future-proof ;-) Oliver Oliver Heger wrote: Dennis Lundberg wrote: Oliver Heger wrote: +1 Some minor remarks (which are not too problematic IMO): -

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Oliver Heger wrote: +1 Some minor remarks (which are not too problematic IMO): - The format of the md5 files is a bit unusual. Other components typically use a format like f88520ed791673aed6cc4591bc058b55 *commons-logging-1.1.1-bin.zip I created them on people.a.o af

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Oliver Heger wrote: +1 Some minor remarks (which are not too problematic IMO): - The format of the md5 files is a bit unusual. Other components typically use a format like f88520ed791673aed6cc4591bc058b55 *commons-logging-1.1.1-bin.zip I created them on people.a.o after uploading the files

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Some minor remarks (which are not too problematic IMO): - The format of the md5 files is a bit unusual. Other components typically use a format like f88520ed791673aed6cc4591bc058b55 *commons-logging-1.1.1-bin.zip - When building the source distribution with maven2 LICENSE and NOTICE are n

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread Torsten Curdt
+1 cheers -- Torsten On 22.11.2007, at 00:37, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last go: - The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them - The manifests no longer mention Jakarta - [LOGGING-118] Generate

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-22 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2007/11/22, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi > > This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > Changes since the last go: > - The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them > - The manifests no longer mention Jakarta > - [LOGGING-118] Generate sourc

[VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

2007-11-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last go: - The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them - The manifests no longer mention Jakarta - [LOGGING-118] Generate source and binary archives. Release Notes: http://issues.apache.org/jira