Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)

2008-01-03 Thread sebb
Just noticed that NOTICE.txt says: Copyright 2002-2007 The Apache Software Foundation There are probably some other instances of 2007 which need to be updated. On 03/01/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The source distros look okay, but can it be that the binary distros are > missi

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)

2008-01-03 Thread Oliver Heger
The source distros look okay, but can it be that the binary distros are missing the binaries? Both the zip and the tar.gz only contain LICENSE and NOTICE and the site directory. Other than that I only found a few (very minor) points: - When building with the different build systems the resulting j

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)

2008-01-02 Thread sebb
On 02/01/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 2, 2008 8:07 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The format is used by the following programs: > > > > md5sum.exe - e.g. http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/using_md5sums.html > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ md5sum derby.log > 6fce75e

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)

2008-01-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Jan 2, 2008 8:07 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The format is used by the following programs: > > md5sum.exe - e.g. http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/using_md5sums.html [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ md5sum derby.log 6fce75e538c458f732d622e0a1d4bbdf derby.log Multiple blanks, no asterisk > m

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)

2008-01-02 Thread sebb
On 01/01/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have prepared a second release candidate of commons-fileupload > 1.2.1. A list of changes since rc1 and things that I haven't changes, > can be found below. > > Thanks, > > Jochen > > > [ ] +1 > [ ] =0 > [ ] -1 > > > > > > > Ther

Re: [all] Maven repo trouble? [was Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)]

2008-01-01 Thread Henri Yandell
On Jan 1, 2008 12:57 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 1, 2008 9:49 PM, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > H. It looks like something in maven is screwed. > > Rats! It's not in Maven. > > The pom file is below org.apache.commons, but the groupId in the pom

Re: [all] Maven repo trouble? [was Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)]

2008-01-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Jan 1, 2008 9:49 PM, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > H. It looks like something in maven is screwed. Rats! It's not in Maven. The pom file is below org.apache.commons, but the groupId in the pom file is commons-io. I'll copy the pom file and the jar file to commons-io/com

[all] Maven repo trouble? [was Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)]

2008-01-01 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Jochen Wiedmann wrote: When trying the m2 build I got the error that commons-io 1.3.2 could not be downloaded. Indeed this version does not seem to be in the central maven repository. Does anybody know why this is the case? Fixed the groupId to org.apache.commons. H. It looks like somethi

[VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc2)

2008-01-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, I have prepared a second release candidate of commons-fileupload 1.2.1. A list of changes since rc1 and things that I haven't changes, can be found below. Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 > There's a minor problem with the hashes. > The hash shold be followed by a single space, and