[STATUS] [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-25 Thread James Carman
All, A vote is underway to release Apache Commons Proxy 1.0 based on the 4th release candidate. Thus far, the votes are as follows: +1 Niall Pemberton (binding) +1 Oliver Heger (binding) +1 "sebb" (binding) +1 James Carman (binding) The vote email was sent Feb 23, 2008 11:47 AM (EDT). The vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, now it works for me. So +1 for the release. Likewise +1 > Oliver > > James Carman schrieb: > > > On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can you perhaps regenerate the sigs manually and upload them so we can > >> re-che

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Okay, now it works for me. So +1 for the release. Oliver James Carman schrieb: On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you perhaps regenerate the sigs manually and upload them so we can re-check them? Done. Sorry about the mix-up. I should have verified them myself. I think what

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread James Carman
On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you perhaps regenerate the sigs manually and upload them so we can > re-check them? Done. Sorry about the mix-up. I should have verified them myself. I think what screwed it up was me monkeying with the "phase" for the gpg plugin. Apparently "

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem > > > with veryfying the signatures. > > > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread James Carman
On 2/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem > > with veryfying the signatures. > > > > I am not sure whether I have imported the correct key of James because >

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24/02/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem > with veryfying the signatures. > > I am not sure whether I have imported the correct key of James because > there have been some commits to KEYS later on. So this may

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-24 Thread Oliver Heger
The artifacts look good to me. Everything is fine, but I had a problem with veryfying the signatures. I am not sure whether I have imported the correct key of James because there have been some commits to KEYS later on. So this may be a problem with my setup. Did anybody else check the signatures?

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-23 Thread James Carman
I guess I should add my: +1 to releasing Proxy based on rc4 On 2/23/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I have created a release candidate for Apache Commons Proxy 1.0. The > release was created from SVN tag found here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pro

Re: [VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 to releasing proxy 1.0 based on rc4 Niall On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:47 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I have created a release candidate for Apache Commons Proxy 1.0. The > release was created from SVN tag found here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/prop

[VOTE] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-23 Thread James Carman
All, I have created a release candidate for Apache Commons Proxy 1.0. The release was created from SVN tag found here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/proxy/tags/proxy-1.0-rc4/ The distribution files can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jcarman/commons-proxy-1.0-rc4/ Th