On 5/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You probably know this, but in case you don't - because this is
> SCXML's first m2 release (or the first release of a new groupId in the
> m2 repo - i.e. "commons-scxml" in this case) you need to ping
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to ask them to
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding my own vote, this vote passes with 6 +1s from:
>
> Phil Steitz
> Oliver Heger
> Sebb
> Luc Maisonobe
> Niall Pemberton
> Rahul Akolkar
>
> Thanks for your time and all the feedback on the process as well. I'll
> comp
Adding my own vote, this vote passes with 6 +1s from:
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
Sebb
Luc Maisonobe
Niall Pemberton
Rahul Akolkar
Thanks for your time and all the feedback on the process as well. I'll
complete the related tasks in a day or two.
-Rahul
On 5/15/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/17/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly +1 from me on this release.
>
> A couple of minor points...
>
> 1) The changes report usually has links to the JIRA tickets, but these
> seem to be missing.
> 2) The dependencyManagement section in the parent pom only affects
> ,
On 5/17/08, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK. Everything seems therefore to be either under control or false positive
> from findbugs.
>
> I therefore change my vote to +1.
>
Great, thanks for taking another look.
-Rahul
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
>>
>> On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahu
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
Whats the deal with linking to J6, as you were discussing in some JIRA comments?
No idea, Henri stated that we can't link to Java 6 in COMMONSSITE-29,
but I don't know why.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To uns
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
>
> On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This is a vote to release the following
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
>
> On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This is a vote to release the following
Firstly +1 from me on this release.
A couple of minor points...
1) The changes report usually has links to the JIRA tickets, but these
seem to be missing.
2) The dependencyManagement section in the parent pom only affects
, and not , so would be good pratice to specify
plugin version numbers in t
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
Thanks Luc, and I appreciate the findbugs run!
On 5/17/08, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Generating the site on Linux, with maven 2 and JDK 1.6.0_06 gives me a few
warnings for tests javadoc (references not found for @link pointing to SCXML
itself). This are
On 5/17/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Javadoc would be nicer with external links to the JDK, JEE and
> Digester. You just have to add this in the POM:
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
>
> true
>
>
> htt
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
On 5/17/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The links to the javadoc are broken on the site, is this intentional ?
Its a combination of staging and the way the Commons SCXML site is
organized on c.a.o.
On the staged site, you can get to the release Javadocs
On 5/17/08, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The links to the javadoc are broken on the site, is this intentional ?
>
Its a combination of staging and the way the Commons SCXML site is
organized on c.a.o.
On the staged site, you can get to the release Javadocs from "Project Reports":
Thanks sebb ...
On 5/16/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks generally OK to me.
>
> Some minor points to consider (for next release?):
>
Yup, will look into these post release.
> TestingTestSuite does not seem to run any tests - it creates a suite,
> but does not add any tests to
Thanks Luc, and I appreciate the findbugs run!
On 5/17/08, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Generating the site on Linux, with maven 2 and JDK 1.6.0_06 gives me a few
> warnings for tests javadoc (references not found for @link pointing to SCXML
> itself). This are details.
>
True,
The links to the javadoc are broken on the site, is this intentional ?
Emmanuel Bourg
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
[ ] +1 for release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
[ ] +1 for release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 for release because...
Vote will close no sooner than Sunday, May 18th (sam
On 16/05/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
>
>
> [ ] +1 for release
+1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 for release because...
> ---
Thanks for taking a look Oliver ...
On 5/16/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Build works fine on JDK 1.6, all artifacts look good.
>
> The only minor nit I have is the checkstyle report containing 164 errors,
> but I guess this is of minor importance.
>
Ugh, missed that. Th
+1
Build works fine on JDK 1.6, all artifacts look good.
The only minor nit I have is the checkstyle report containing 164
errors, but I guess this is of minor importance.
Oliver
Rahul Akolkar schrieb:
This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
http://people.
Thanks for your time Phil, comments below ...
On 5/16/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/commo
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
>
>
> [ X] +1 for release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 for release because...
>
This is a vote to release the following artifacts as Commons SCXML 0.8:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.8/RC2/
[ ] +1 for release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 for release because...
Vote will close no sooner than Sunday, May 18th (same time).
TIA for your tim
24 matches
Mail list logo
