On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Niall,
>>>
>>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
rename the F
ail: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
> Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 13:11
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 b
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> Hi Niall,
>>
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
>>> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
>>> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and im
This vote has passed with five +1 votes (4 binding) from the following people:
Simone Tripodi
Gary Gregory
Rahul Akolkar
Henri Biestro
Niall Pemberton
Thanks for all the feedback and votes - apologies it took 5 RCs
Niall
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have prepared
+1 from me btw
Niall
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>
> The RC3 changes were improve
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
>> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
>> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>>
>> The RC3
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>
> The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were causing
> int
Checked trunk build on WinXP & Mac OS / jdk 1.6; mvn site ok (besides javadoc
link).
+1
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Commons-IO-2-0-based-on-RC5-tp2996424p2998344.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.c
+1
-Rahul
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>
> The RC3 changes were improvements to s
On 15 October 2010 21:13, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:35 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 15 October 2010 03:14, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
>>> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
>>> FileAlterationObserver/Mo
m
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 13:11
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC5
>
> Sebb has previously raised issu
ry(File, File, boolean)
> ignores exceptional return value of java.io.File.mkdirs()
> > FileUtils.java:2135
> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.moveFileToDirectory(File, File, boolean)
> ignores exceptional return value of java.io.File.mkdirs()
> >
> > There are a couple mo
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 October 2010 03:14, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
>> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
>> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>>
>> The R
FileUtils.moveFileToDirectory(File,
> File, boolean) ignores exceptional return value of java.io.File.mkdirs()
>
> There are a couple more that I am looking at...
>
> -
> Gary Gregory
>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Simone Tripodi [mailto:simon
mail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 01:17
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC5
>
> Hi Niall,
> should the clirr report link located on
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/site/clirr-report.html
> instead of htt
On 15 October 2010 03:14, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>
> The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Niall,
> should the clirr report link located on
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/site/clirr-report.html
> instead of http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc4/site/clirr-report.html?
Yes, sorry, my mistake.
> I can't sp
Hi Niall,
should the clirr report link located on
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc5/site/clirr-report.html
instead of http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc4/site/clirr-report.html?
I can't speak about the implementation stuff because my knowledge on
IO is not good enough, but releas
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were causing
intermittent failures in Gump & Continuum and Java
19 matches
Mail list logo
