[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-25 Thread Oliver Heger
The vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 has passed with the following binding +1 votes: Jörg Schaible Rahul Akolkar Oliver Heger Luc Maisonobe Thanks to all who participated in the vote and gave their feedback. I will start the release procedure soon. Oliver ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-25 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Oliver Heger a écrit : > This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd > release candidate. +1 Luc > > Changes since RC1 are the following: > - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed. > - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs sti

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Ralph Goers wrote: > I am working on more enhancements and will want to check them in fairly > soon. Hopefully RC2 is OK, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better > to do the release from a branch. > I'd say just go ahead. I think it is unlikely that some problems with the RC are found now -

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-23 Thread Ralph Goers
I am working on more enhancements and will want to check them in fairly soon. Hopefully RC2 is OK, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to do the release from a branch. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Adding my own +1. Oliver Oliver Heger schrieb: This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd release candidate. Changes since RC1 are the following: - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed. - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findb

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Rahul Akolkar schrieb: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows 2000 VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network configuration issue?

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows 2000 >> VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network configuration >> issue? >> > > > No ide

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Oliver Heger wrote: > This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd > release candidate. > > Changes since RC1 are the following: > - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed. > - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still > reports

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-20 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows 2000 > VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network configuration > issue? > No idea since I didn't get any time yet to dig into it. However, I did try t

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Rahul Akolkar schrieb: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu with Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that. Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted). Can

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>> What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu >>> with >>> Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that. >>> >> >> >> Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-19 Thread Ralph Goers
On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu with Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that. Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted). Can anyone else verify? -Rahul Actually, I was expecting that answer. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>> >> >> >> In trying to build the above with m1 as well as m2 (JDK 1.6) I get a >> test failure [1]. >> >> -Rahul >> >> [1] >> Testcase: testGetInetAddres >> (org.apache.commons.configurati

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-19 Thread Ralph Goers
On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: In trying to build the above with m1 as well as m2 (JDK 1.6) I get a test failure [1]. -Rahul [1] Testcase: testGetInetAddres (org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration): FAILED ConversionException should be thrown for un

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd > release candidate. > > Changes since RC1 are the following: > - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed. > - Some problems reported by findbugs have been

[VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2

2008-12-19 Thread Oliver Heger
This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd release candidate. Changes since RC1 are the following: - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed. - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still reports some issues, but the remaining