[RESULT][VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote has passed with six +1 votes (all binding) from the following people: Henri Yandell Dion Gillard Niall Pemberton Oliver Heger Jörg Schaible Rahul Akolkar Thanks to everyone who tested/voted. I'll complete the release process this weekend. Niall On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0) > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then. > Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to > hopefully facilitate wider

RE: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Niall, Niall Pemberton wrote on Friday, August 03, 2007 3:52 AM: [snip] >>> Since the test implies some nasty error condition (I did not have a >>> look at the code yet), it might simply reveal some error of the JDK >>> (especially since IBM JDK 1.4.2 works) ... >> >> BeanUtils has "per Clas

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-02 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/3/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/2/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Niall, > > > > I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux > > using my compiler zoo. > > > > One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the conso

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-02 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/2/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Niall, > > I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux > using my compiler zoo. > > One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with > quite some printed stack traces. However, for most o

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Niall, I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux using my compiler zoo. One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with quite some printed stack traces. However, for most of my JDK's (Blackdown 1.4.2.03, IDM JDK 1.4.2.9, JRockit 1.4.2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-02 Thread Oliver Heger
All looks good. +1 Oliver Niall Pemberton wrote: Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0) and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then. Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to hopefully facilitate wider testing fo

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 from me btw Niall On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0) > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then. > Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to > hope

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm +1. > > WRT the RAT report, is there a reason we don't include the ASL header? Its not part of the distro - I just ran it from the command line for anyone reviewing the RC (same with clirr report). Niall > On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAI

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. > > Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too. Sounds good, do you have any suggestions? IMO it was important that this release was compatibile for all the bugs fixed. A BeanUtils 2.0 with deprecations and copied Collec

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Dion Gillard
I'm +1. WRT the RAT report, is there a reason we don't include the ASL header? On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0) > and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then. > Since BeanUtils

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Dion Gillard
+1. Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too. On 8/2/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src > > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does sa

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src > > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and > > again: > > > > [copy] Warning: org/apa

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and > again: > > [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified > in the future. > > No

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-08-01 Thread Henri Yandell
All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and again: [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified in the future. No biggy if no one else can reproduce that. Only query would be whet

[VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 Beta (RC1)

2007-07-31 Thread Niall Pemberton
Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0) and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then. Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to hopefully facilitate wider testing for 1.8.0. Release Notes: http://people.apache.org/~n