This vote passes with the following binding +1 votes:
- Henri Biestro
- Rob Tompkins
- Gary Gregory
- Thomas Vandahl
Thanks to all the voters.
I will proceed with the publication.
Bye, Thomas
> Am 16.09.2023 um 13:41 schrieb Rob Tompkins :
>
> +1
> Signatures validate properly
> Build works ap
+1
Signatures validate properly
Build works appropriately on java 8, 11, and 17
Reports all look appropriate, RAT (licenses), japicmp (backwards
compatibility), and soptbugs
Nit (major, non-blocking). No site built for commons-jcs: Apache Commons
Distribution or for JCache, OpenJPA
Thanks for al
[+1]
Build and tests ok.
Small things that could be addressed in the future; test coverage and
check-style reports would be nice. Release notes could use some love, some old
JIRA should be assigned a 'fixed version' so as not to appear in front.
Tested using jdk8:
uname -a && mvn -version
D
Could I have one more (positive :-) PMC vote please?
> Am 03.09.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Thomas Vandahl :
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
> Apache Commons JCS 3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons JCS 3.2.
>
> Apache Commons
+1
ASC OK
SHA512 OK
These are not showstoppers but they should be addressed at some point:
- I'd prefer we always use M.M.M version formats, here 3.2.0.
- This site page incorrectly lists links to the RC instead of what
will be the real page
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
>
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
My vote
Bye, Thomas
--
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
Apache Commons JCS 3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons
JCS 3.2.
Apache Commons JCS 3.2 rc1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.2-rc1 (svn revisio
