+1
On 03/07/16 16:12, Gilles wrote:
Vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/xisnvgq7f5w7c6o2
+1
Gilles Sadowski
Artem Barger
Rob Tompkins
Venkatesha Murthy
+0
Benedikt Ritter
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Feel free to fill in any missing names.
People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-)
Vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/xisnvgq7f5w7c6o2
+1
Gilles Sadowski
Artem Barger
Rob Tompkins
Venkatesha Murthy
+0
Benedikt Ritter
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Feel free to fill in any missing names.
People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-)
Regards,
Gilles
+1
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 1:27 AM, Artem Barger wrote:
+1 [contributor]
Best regards,
Artem Barger.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1 [contributor, not committer]
>
> > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jun
+1 [contributor]
Best regards,
Artem Barger.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1 [contributor, not committer]
>
> > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 + (UTC), venkatesha m wrote:
> >> Does this use J
+1 [contributor, not committer]
> On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 + (UTC), venkatesha m wrote:
>> Does this use Java 8?
>
> What is "this"?
>
> If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new
> thread.
>
> Thank you,
> Gilles
>
>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:55:35 + (UTC), venkatesha m wrote:
Does this use Java 8?
What is "this"?
If you want to discuss (rather than vote), please start a new
thread.
Thank you,
Gilles
On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkin
Does this use Java 8?
On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary G
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang
could
incl
> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang could
>>> include a random package.
Yes, and it fe
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang
could
include a random package.
For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too.
And [compress], [crypt
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang could
> include a random package.
For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too.
Jochen
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
http://www.keysto
One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang could
include a random package.
Gary
On Jun 25, 2016 9:06 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:01:14 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
>> +0
>>
>> The big mix of stuff here makes it feel like Commons Math Lite,
>>
>
> H
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:01:14 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
+0
The big mix of stuff here makes it feel like Commons Math Lite,
Hmm, no; it's certainly more akin to... Commons Lang, but
more focused (on numerical utilities) and much leaner!
Actually, the big code chunk is, by far, "FastMath
+0
The big mix of stuff here makes it feel like Commons Math Lite, so I would
not decide on this before the Math TLP/Incubator route is settled (or
abandoned).
On 21 Jun 2016 8:30 p.m., "Gilles" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This is one of several votes for establishing new Commons components
> out of fu
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:45:33 +, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
+/- 0 I'm unsure.
We already have some Math code in Commons Lang. Maybe this code would
fit
into o.a.c.lang3.math ?
In principle, yes, but I'd be wary of a big codebase that becomes less
and less focused.
I think that whatever is a
+/- 0 I'm unsure.
We already have some Math code in Commons Lang. Maybe this code would fit
into o.a.c.lang3.math ?
OTOH it's a big codebase, it may make sense to make a separate component
out of it.
The scope is pretty math centric. So a Math TLP may be a better home for
this.
Benedikt
Gilles
Le 21/06/2016 à 21:30, Gilles a écrit :
> This vote is dedicated to the following functionality:
> Standard mathematical functions (either missing from "java.lang.Math",
> or faster or more accurate than their counterpart in the JDK) and
> floating point utilities.
-0, I don't feel the scop
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This is one of several votes for establishing new Commons components
> out of functionality developed inside the "Commons Math" component.
>
> This vote is dedicated to the following functionality:
> Standard mathematical functions (e
Hello.
This is one of several votes for establishing new Commons components
out of functionality developed inside the "Commons Math" component.
This vote is dedicated to the following functionality:
Standard mathematical functions (either missing from
"java.lang.Math",
or faster or more ac
19 matches
Mail list logo
