Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

+1 On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant for the following > reasons: > > - Jelly hasn’t seen any activity in a while. There haven’t been any relevant > commits since 2010 (I didn’t search the history further tha

Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

Hi, > Am 19.05.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Oliver Heger >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> thank you for looking into this. >> >> Am 18.05.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >>> Hi, >>> Am 17.05.2017 um 19:38

Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

opers List Sent: Saturday, 20 May 2017 8:44 AM Subject: Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant) > Am 19.05.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Oliver Heger : > > Hi, > > thank you for looking into this. > > Am 18.05.2017 um 16:46

Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

On 19 May 2017 at 22:02, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> thank you for looking into this. >> >> Am 18.05.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >> > Hi, >> > >> >> Am 17.05.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Gary Gregory : >> >> >> >> I think that we

Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi, > > thank you for looking into this. > > Am 18.05.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hi, > > > >> Am 17.05.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Gary Gregory : > >> > >> I think that we could, as a community test of interest, say something > lik

Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

> Am 19.05.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Oliver Heger : > > Hi, > > thank you for looking into this. > > Am 18.05.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >> Hi, >> >>> Am 17.05.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Gary Gregory >> >: >>> >>> I think that we could, as a community test of

Re: [JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

Hi, thank you for looking into this. Am 18.05.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > >> Am 17.05.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Gary Gregory : >> >> I think that we could, as a community test of interest, say something like, >> if Oliver wants to push out what is in trunk in the next 30 days or s

[RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

> Am 17.05.2017 um 14:26 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > Hi, > > I think we should move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant for the following > reasons: > > - Jelly hasn’t seen any activity in a while. There haven’t been any relevant > commits since 2010 (I didn’t search the history further than th

[JELLY] State of the project (Was: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant)

Hi, > Am 17.05.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > I think that we could, as a community test of interest, say something like, > if Oliver wants to push out what is in trunk in the next 30 days or so (or > 60 or 90), we will help. I would help with odds and ends. Aside from that, > if no one

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

I think that we could, as a community test of interest, say something like, if Oliver wants to push out what is in trunk in the next 30 days or so (or 60 or 90), we will help. I would help with odds and ends. Aside from that, if no one cares enough to "do", then let's hibernate it. Gary On Wed, M

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

Hey guys, this is just the reaction I’m looking for. I think it is important to poke in the hole every once in a while and see if anybody is still interested in a component. If you have intends to work on Jelly, there is no reason to move it to dormant. I’ll wait for the 72 hours to pass anywa

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

Ditto for my -1. I've always wanted to move Jenkins fork patches back to Jelly, but last time I worked on it Mavenizing the project and its components took too much time. Bruno Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:34, Oliver Heger wrote: Hm, being a user of Jelly, I

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

Hm, being a user of Jelly, I have the long-term goal to contribute to the project because I have indeed some itch to scratch, but unfortunately never got to it. So I am -1, but I cannot promise that I can work on Jelly in the near future. Oliver Am 17.05.2017 um 20:26 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

+1 Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant for the following > reasons: > > - Jelly hasn’t seen any activity in a while. There haven’t been any > relevant commits since 2010 (I didn’t search the history further than > that…) - The last release dat

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant for the following > reasons: > > - Jelly hasn’t seen any activity in a while. There haven’t been any > relevant commits since 2010 (I didn’t search the history further than th

[VOTE][LAZY] Move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant

Hi, I think we should move Apache Commons Jelly to dormant for the following reasons: - Jelly hasn’t seen any activity in a while. There haven’t been any relevant commits since 2010 (I didn’t search the history further than that…) - The last release dates back to 2005. - There is no activity in