On Jun 10, 2016 10:23 AM, "James Carman" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM Gary Gregory
wrote:
>
> >
> > I think mailing the list for each component is nice. It seems polite,
less
> > overbearing and less brute-force; IOW more community oriented. The VOTE
is
> > nice because it gives fol
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I think mailing the list for each component is nice. It seems polite, less
> overbearing and less brute-force; IOW more community oriented. The VOTE is
> nice because it gives folks a few days to voice and record their objection
> (I do not
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:14 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Perhaps I should re-phrase (may not make a difference, but it could). Can
> we just say that any component that wishes to migrate can feel free to do
> so at this time? We don't need a VOTE or anything. If someone gets the
> cycles and ins
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Fr., 10. Juni 2016
> um 14:14 Uhr:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This vote passes by lazy consensus.
>>
>> So, again: Who's next?
>>
>
> Pick one you like. How about
Perhaps I should re-phrase (may not make a difference, but it could). Can
we just say that any component that wishes to migrate can feel free to do
so at this time? We don't need a VOTE or anything. If someone gets the
cycles and inspiration to do so, they can feel free to go right ahead.
That's
Yes
On 10 June 2016 at 13:57, James Carman wrote:
> Is anyone opposed at this time to moving everything at once?
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:56 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Fr., 10. Juni 2016
>> um 14:14 Uhr:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Kristian Rosen
Is anyone opposed at this time to moving everything at once?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:56 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Fr., 10. Juni 2016
> um 14:14 Uhr:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This vote passes by lazy consensus.
Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Fr., 10. Juni 2016
um 14:14 Uhr:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
>
> > This vote passes by lazy consensus.
>
> So, again: Who's next?
>
Pick one you like. How about FileUpload?
>
>
>
> --
> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the w
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> This vote passes by lazy consensus.
So, again: Who's next?
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
-
This vote passes by lazy consensus.
The following people have voted +1:
- Jochen Wiedmann
- Sergio Fernández
- Gary Gregory
- James Carman
I'll take care of the migration and keep the ML updated about the progress.
Regards,
Kristian (Master of ^C^V)
2016-06-07 12:46 GMT+02:00 James Carman :
>
+1
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:37 AM Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY
> consensus for migrating the Apache Commons IO component to git. Please
> object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote
> will be considered as passed after 72 hour
+1
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> +1
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Kristian Rosenvold >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY
> > consensus for migrating the Apache Commons IO component to git. Please
> > object to this vote if you
+1
Gary
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY
> consensus for migrating the Apache Commons IO component to git. Please
> object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote
> will be considered as passed after
+1 (go for it)
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY
> consensus for migrating the Apache Commons IO component to git. Please
> object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote
> will be considered as passed
Hello,
I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY
consensus for migrating the Apache Commons IO component to git. Please
object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote
will be considered as passed after 72 hours from now (10th June 2016, 09:00
CET)
Thank you,
Kristian
15 matches
Mail list logo