On 9 November 2010 17:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 9 November 2010 09:28, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> sebb wrote:
>>>
On 8 November 2010 10:37, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> The only solution then would be to use
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote:
> On 9 November 2010 09:28, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 November 2010 10:37, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote:
[snip]
> The only solution then would be to use Class throughout.
>
> All I'm suggesting is changing the r
On 9 November 2010 09:28, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 8 November 2010 10:37, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Hi Sebb,
>>>
>>> sebb wrote:
>>>
On 8 November 2010 08:49, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
>>
>> Th
sebb wrote:
> On 8 November 2010 10:37, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 November 2010 08:49, Jörg Schaible wrote:
sebb wrote:
> Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
>
> There are still a few raw Class references; most of these can be
On 8 November 2010 10:37, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 8 November 2010 08:49, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> sebb wrote:
>>>
Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
There are still a few raw Class references; most of these can be fixed
if DefaultFil
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote:
> On 8 November 2010 08:49, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
>>>
>>> There are still a few raw Class references; most of these can be fixed
>>> if DefaultFileSystemConfigBuilder.getConfigClass() is changed to
>>> retur
On 8 November 2010 08:49, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
>>
>> There are still a few raw Class references; most of these can be fixed
>> if DefaultFileSystemConfigBuilder.getConfigClass() is changed to
>> return a FileSystem [1]
>>
>> Can any
sebb wrote:
> Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
>
> There are still a few raw Class references; most of these can be fixed
> if DefaultFileSystemConfigBuilder.getConfigClass() is changed to
> return a FileSystem [1]
>
> Can anyone else confirm that this is a sensible change?
>
> [1
Most of the generics fixes have now been done.
There are still a few raw Class references; most of these can be fixed
if DefaultFileSystemConfigBuilder.getConfigClass() is changed to
return a FileSystem [1]
Can anyone else confirm that this is a sensible change?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jir