Oh, you did? I thought I did an update before I sent my last email and
didn't see any changes from you. Perhaps I just missed it then :)
Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry for not being clearer. I've already updated trunk with 'as good
as it gets for now' code. These are the low-hanging fruit
Hi,
I am sorry for not being clearer. I've already updated trunk with 'as good
as it gets for now' code. These are the low-hanging fruit changes I wrote
about plus updates to the latest Commons Net and IO IIRC (on my phone now).
I would like a new RC to pick up these changes, see my other email(s
Gary -- how quickly can you turn around a patch to fix this? Without a
patch, I am still in favor of 2.1 being released as is. 2.1.1 can be
released with these fixes at your earliest convenience.
Gary Gregory wrote:
Just for completeness, I'm advocating we do this now, but new methods to
inter
(catching up)
Thanks for writing this note, Sebb. It completely aligns with my
opinion. In the docs from Oracle which you earlier linked, method
additions *do not* break binary compatibility. I'm a little confused why
this is being brought up for at least a second time now (could have been
th
Just for completeness, I'm advocating we do this now, but new methods to
interfaces could be added as subinterfaces as in FileContent2 extends
FileContent.
Gary
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> I have just looked again at the Clirr errors.
>
> Apart from the interface method additi
I have just looked again at the Clirr errors.
Apart from the interface method additions, the changes are:
*) Replacing org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.tar.TarEntry by
org.apache.commons.compress.archivers.tar.TarArchiveEntry in several
places.
TarEntry has been dropped, however the class was pa
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> That was me. I have had those thoughts and mentioned them a few times
> since Java 7 was released. But absolutely no effort has been expended to do
> it.
>
> My personal opinion is that I am comfortable with releasing 2.1 with the
> issues Gar
That was me. I have had those thoughts and mentioned them a few times since
Java 7 was released. But absolutely no effort has been expended to do it.
My personal opinion is that I am comfortable with releasing 2.1 with the issues
Gary mentions. There should have been 10 releases for VFS 2 by no
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I thought there were talks about using Java 1.7 APIs in 3.0 that would
> eliminate the need for some classes in commons-vfs, or am I confusing that
> with another commons project?
>
You are correct, but this is a big job worthy of a major rele
I thought there were talks about using Java 1.7 APIs in 3.0 that would
eliminate the need for some classes in commons-vfs, or am I confusing that
with another commons project?
On 6 May 2016 at 17:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> OK, I've gone through the Clirr report and fixed the low-hanging fruits in
OK, I've gone through the Clirr report and fixed the low-hanging fruits in
trunk. I think we need another RC. I've also update Apache Commons Compress
and Net to their current versions.
Then what we have to live with for 2.1 is BC breaks in two narrower areas:
- Added methods to interfaces.
- Cha
sebb wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 22:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread.
>>
>> First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a
>> release, I'm sure he did not know what he was getting himself into! ;-)
>
> Huh? ... t
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 22:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread.
> >
> > First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a
> > release, I'm sure he did not know what he was gett
On 6 May 2016 at 22:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread.
>
> First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a
> release, I'm sure he did not know what he was getting himself into! ;-)
Huh? ... that was/is Josh Elser.
I'm creating a new thread here instead of hijacking the VOTE thread.
First, let me express my gratitude to Stian Soiland-Reyes for RM'ing a
release, I'm sure he did not know what he was getting himself into! ;-)
Part of me writing this here is flushing out for myself, voters, and casual
observers
15 matches
Mail list logo
