On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:31 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> So presumably the following commented lines can be removed?
>
> //boolean next = !SCXMLHelper.isStringEmpty(t.getNext());
> //if (next) {
> //b.append(" target=\"" + t.getNext() + "\"");
> //}
>b.append(">
On 08/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> > Looks like the main remaining item with the J6 branch is the removal
> > of deprecated code.
> >
>
>
>
> WRT the cleanup you mean?
Yes.
> Perhaps. In general, that is by far not the
> main remaining ite
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> Looks like the main remaining item with the J6 branch is the removal
> of deprecated code.
>
WRT the cleanup you mean? Perhaps. In general, that is by far not the
main remaining item. In terms of making the branch release-ready, the
main pending item
Looks like the main remaining item with the J6 branch is the removal
of deprecated code.
In the case of SCXMLSemanticsImpl it looks like the two lines of code
can just be removed as the comment says (the test still passes if I do
this).
I'm not sure about the changes needed to SCXMLSerializer - c
