On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:35:23 -0500, Hank Grabowski wrote:
I was pleasantly surprised to see that you got the coefficients and
algorithms from that article working. I'm surprised it was a
flipping of
the coefficients. When I re-implemented it in Octave a flipped
coefficient
matrix caused for
I was pleasantly surprised to see that you got the coefficients and
algorithms from that article working. I'm surprised it was a flipping of
the coefficients. When I re-implemented it in Octave a flipped coefficient
matrix caused for more havoc than the correctly oriented one. The
"correctly ori
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:57:58 -0500, Hank Grabowski wrote:
That's good that there has been some progress on this. Are you
looking for
discussions here or in the JIRA incident?
The official forum for discussions is here; the bug-tracking
system is best reserved for, well, tracking the implement
That's good that there has been some progress on this. Are you looking for
discussions here or in the JIRA incident?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please have a look at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1166
>
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>
> -
Hi.
Please have a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1166
Regards,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
