Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What do you think of introducing logging statements in CM?
> [If it was already discussed, does someone have a pointer?]
We have not discussed this topic much since the beginning of [math],
when we made the decision to try to avoid any external dependencies
and th
For what its worth (with warning about different strokes for different
folks), we just removed all logging from the math portions of Mahout and
were glad of it.
The only exception was the massive map-reduce SVD solver that can run for
hours or days. Getting log message out of that is actually nic
--
From: "Ted Dunning"
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 1:11 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [Math] Help in debugging process
From a user's point of view logging is a waste of time if it doesn't tell
the
>From a user's point of view logging is a waste of time if it doesn't tell
them something that they need/can take action on. Thus, I could see that a
solve might log some hints about what to do when it detects a badly
ill-conditioned input, but I would be really not happy if it logs every
pivot va
Depends on the performance impact. I certainly wouldn't want to
discover that upgrading CM to new version made my code 20% slower
because the optimizer now logs stuff I'm not interested in.
Regards,
Roman Werpachowski
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What do you
I would think that this would only be of use in very long running iterative
algorithms and of only very minimal interest to the user.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> What do you think of introducing logging statements in CM?
> [If it was a
Hi.
What do you think of introducing logging statements in CM?
[If it was already discussed, does someone have a pointer?]
Best,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
