On 10/17/2014 03:12 PM, sebb wrote:
On 17 October 2014 19:49, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the discussion of how MATH-1138 was handled (Which I enjoy
reading because I'm very impressed with how eloquently everyone communicates
their points of view).
Just a warning that I might be ignor
Ah, that is a more complicated question. Those discussions definitely
aren't part of the repository. As someone now recently bitten by the
confusion in where discussions should be taking place, I agree there should
be a good documentation of those swim lanes. I'm new to contributing to
open sour
On 17 October 2014 21:16, Hank Grabowski wrote:
> The nice thing about Github, from my perspective as a person with only
> read-only access to the ASF repositories, is that it provides me with the
> ability to work in my own fork and then initiate pull requests that can be
> incorporated into the
The nice thing about Github, from my perspective as a person with only
read-only access to the ASF repositories, is that it provides me with the
ability to work in my own fork and then initiate pull requests that can be
incorporated into the root repository. I think it is still ideal that the
GitH
On 17 October 2014 19:49, Ole Ersoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm following the discussion of how MATH-1138 was handled (Which I enjoy
> reading because I'm very impressed with how eloquently everyone communicates
> their points of view).
>
> Just a warning that I might be ignoring [2] (Stolen from Gilles)
Hi,
I'm following the discussion of how MATH-1138 was handled (Which I enjoy
reading because I'm very impressed with how eloquently everyone communicates
their points of view).
Just a warning that I might be ignoring [2] (Stolen from Gilles), because I
have suggested this before:
