Re: [Math] About MATH-768

2012-07-15 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > > > > Referring to: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-768 > > > > It seems that cleanly fixing that issue would require to create several > > new classes inside the "o.a.c.m.complex" package (like > > "UnivariateComplexFunction", "PolynomialComplexFunction", > > "BaseAbst

Re: [Math] About MATH-768

2012-07-15 Thread Luc Maisonobe
On 15/07/2012 04:21, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > Referring to: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-768 > > It seems that cleanly fixing that issue would require to create several > new classes inside the "o.a.c.m.complex" package (like > "UnivariateComplexFunction", "Polynomial

[Math] About MATH-768

2012-07-14 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Referring to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-768 It seems that cleanly fixing that issue would require to create several new classes inside the "o.a.c.m.complex" package (like "UnivariateComplexFunction", "PolynomialComplexFunction", "BaseAbstractUnivariateSolver", etc.) all