code is currently factored means that
> > you'd get write access when you only need read...
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > ---- Original message ----
> > From: Benedikt Ritter
> > Date:01/30/2014 13:22 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List
>
Benedikt Ritter
> Date:01/30/2014 13:22 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [LANG] FieldUtils forceAccess does not force access for final
>
> So the point you're making is that accessibility alway includes write
> access?
>
>
> 2014/1/29 Gary Grego
Utils forceAccess does not force access for final
So the point you're making is that accessibility alway includes write
access?
2014/1/29 Gary Gregory
> Hi All:
>
> I have a use case where I need to use reflection to set a public static
> final Object.
>
> This does not wo
So the point you're making is that accessibility alway includes write
access?
2014/1/29 Gary Gregory
> Hi All:
>
> I have a use case where I need to use reflection to set a public static
> final Object.
>
> This does not work with our FieldUtils class because the "forceAccess"
> argument is onl
Hi All:
I have a use case where I need to use reflection to set a public static
final Object.
This does not work with our FieldUtils class because the "forceAccess"
argument is only used to deal with field visibility by calling
Field#setAccessible(boolean)
Q1: Should "forceAccess" be expanded to
