On 21 August 2013 07:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2013/8/19 sebb
>
>> The Groovy version used by JCI is very out of date.
>>
>> I've updated it to the most recent of the 1.7 series, but since then
>> there has been 1.8 and 2.0, as well as 2.1.x which is the current
>> series.
>>
>> Should JCI up
2013/8/19 sebb
> The Groovy version used by JCI is very out of date.
>
> I've updated it to the most recent of the 1.7 series, but since then
> there has been 1.8 and 2.0, as well as 2.1.x which is the current
> series.
>
> Should JCI update to one of the more recent versions?
>
> I don't have a
Hm. Not sure either but I would vote for the update.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
The Groovy version used by JCI is very out of date.
I've updated it to the most recent of the 1.7 series, but since then
there has been 1.8 and 2.0, as well as 2.1.x which is the current
series.
Should JCI update to one of the more recent versions?
I don't have amy experience of Groovy versions