Github user chtompki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/47
I see no reason to not pull this in. Thanks for the contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user chtompki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/47
Cool. I'll get to this point n the morning.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user arunvinudss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/47
@chtompki Added test cases to improve line coverage .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/47
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11922169)
Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 96.924% when pulling
**65f5889f501f784264606f
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/47
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11922169)
Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 96.924% when pulling
**65f5889f501f784264606f
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/47
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11922169)
Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 96.924% when pulling
**65f5889f501f784264606f
