Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread Oliver Heger
sebb wrote: > On 01/04/2009, James Carman wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the >> > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page >> > says that Maven 1.x is the pr

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread sebb
On 01/04/2009, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the > > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page > > says that Maven 1.x is the preferred build too

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread James Ring
Hey, On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:00 AM, sebb wrote: >> wrote: >> > >> > Do we really need to support Ant, Maven 1.x and Maven 2? > > If the project supports Java 1.3, then IMO it should have a way of > building and testing on Java 1.3, in which case it needs something > else other than Maven 2

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-03-31 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page > says that Maven 1.x is the preferred build tool and that ant can also be > used. Yet I've done a

[Configuration] Building

2009-03-31 Thread Ralph Goers
I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page says that Maven 1.x is the preferred build tool and that ant can also be used. Yet I've done all my builds with Maven 2 and the webdav test was only