Congratulation!
Gary
On Jan 28, 2011, at 18:28, "Julius Davies" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>> Now that the main Base-N refactoring is done, the door is open for Base16 ;)
>> Juluis, you had mentioned Base16 before, any interest?
>>
>
> Sorry, I can't, a
On 28 January 2011 23:27, Julius Davies wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>> Now that the main Base-N refactoring is done, the door is open for Base16 ;)
>> Juluis, you had mentioned Base16 before, any interest?
>>
>
> Sorry, I can't, at least not for codec-1.5. T
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Now that the main Base-N refactoring is done, the door is open for Base16 ;)
> Juluis, you had mentioned Base16 before, any interest?
>
Sorry, I can't, at least not for codec-1.5. The baby came
yesterday!!! He still has no name. 8lbs 3oz
...@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 16:17
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [CODEC] Base-n refactoring
>
> On 27 January 2011 21:03, Gary Gregory
> w
On 27 January 2011 21:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 15:13
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: [CODEC] Base-n refactoring
>>
>> I think I've n
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 15:13
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [CODEC] Base-n refactoring
>
> I think I've now got the Base32 classes to a reasonable state. (More
> tests are sure
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 15:13
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [CODEC] Base-n refactoring
>
> I think I've now got the Base32 classes to a reasonable state. (More
> tests are sure
I think I've now got the Base32 classes to a reasonable state. (More
tests are surely needed).
I decided to drop all the static encode/decode methods, as this
simplifies the class considerably.
Perhaps one are two are needed, but it might be best to release
without them and add later if there is a
> -Original Message-
> From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 17:10
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [CODEC] Base-n refactoring
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Julius Davies
> wrote:
> >>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Julius Davies wrote:
>>
>> Which begs for full support of the RFC with... Base16!
>>
>> That should really clean up the refactoring :)
>>
>> Gary
>>
>
> Nice work, Sebb! Gary if you do Base64 I'll do Base2
>
>
>
Doh, meant to say "Gary, if you do Base16 I'l
>
> Which begs for full support of the RFC with... Base16!
>
> That should really clean up the refactoring :)
>
> Gary
>
Nice work, Sebb! Gary if you do Base64 I'll do Base2
--
yours,
Julius Davies
250-592-2284 (Home)
$ sudo apt-get install cowsay
$ echo "Moo." | cowsay | cowsay -n |
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:05
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [CODEC] Base-n refactoring
>
> I have just committed a reworking of the Base32 class, and added I/O
> stream classes for i
I have just committed a reworking of the Base32 class, and added I/O
stream classes for it.
As can be seen, the specific I/O classes are pretty simple, as most of
the code is in the super-classes.
I think these are probably good enough (apart from the name!)
Likewise, the Base32 super-class (curr
13 matches
Mail list logo
