great, looking forward for more contributions Paul!!!
thanks a lot, have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Here's my +1 non-binding.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrot
Here's my +1 non-binding.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> The proposal of making the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
> for the [chain] component passes with 3 +1 binding votes from
>
> * Simone Tripodi
> * James Carman
> * Matt Benson
>
> no other
Hi all,
The proposal of making the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
for the [chain] component passes with 3 +1 binding votes from
* Simone Tripodi
* James Carman
* Matt Benson
no other votes have been casted.
I'm going to move the current trunk in a 1.X branch, and the 2.0-work in
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
> push a next
+1
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Sep 7, 2011 4:27 AM, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> just to remind that vote closes on Thu 8 Sept on 3:13 PM GMT, please
> cast your votes! :)
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonet
Hi all,
just to remind that vote closes on Thu 8 Sept on 3:13 PM GMT, please
cast your votes! :)
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Jochen!
> we still haven't beca
Hi Jochen!
we still haven't because, as emerged in the past discussions, actual
modifications can still be considered acceptable in therms of
retro-compatibility.
Anyway, we are also in the middle of discussions about API redesign,
and breaking the 1.X compatibility, so we will update those metadat
On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Housework check:
>
> - Has the package name been changed?
> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release
- it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name ha
Housework check:
- Has the package name been changed?
A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
DAOes t wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch 2.
my +1
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch
Hi all guys,
thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
push a next release soon.
We are in the middle of discussing about the curren
11 matches
Mail list logo
