On 9 September 2015 at 11:11, sebb wrote:
> On 4 September 2015 at 18:46, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> I read and understood the comment as to the reasoning, but the problem is
>> the shared code nature of FieldOrMethod.
>
> What comment was that?
I see now, you meant the comment against the method
g
On 4 September 2015 at 18:46, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I read and understood the comment as to the reasoning, but the problem is the
> shared code nature of FieldOrMethod.
What comment was that?
> When dealing with a method you know a priori that the object cannot be an
> array. Now to get the C
I read and understood the comment as to the reasoning, but the problem is the
shared code nature of FieldOrMethod. When dealing with a method you know a
priori that the object cannot be an array. Now to get the ClassName of an
InvokeInstruction operand you must say
invoke.getReferenceType(cp)
