Re: [BCEL] Java version

to:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:48 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [BCEL] Java version > > On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not > > compile on Java 1.5. >

RE: [BCEL] Java version

I think 7 is fine. I would be hesitant to go all the way to 8 at this time. Thanks, Mark -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:48 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [BCEL] Java version On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary

Re: [BCEL] Java version

OK, I'll bump it up to Java 7. Gary On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:47 AM, sebb wrote: > On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not compile > > on Java 1.5. > > > > I say we just move the req to java 7 or 8 and move on. > >

Re: [BCEL] Java version

On 13 August 2015 at 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote: > The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not compile > on Java 1.5. > > I say we just move the req to java 7 or 8 and move on. I would be OK with Java 7 as a minimum. I realise that I normally argue for the minimum Java versi

[BCEL] Java version

The POM sets the source version to Java 1.5 but the code does not compile on Java 1.5. I say we just move the req to java 7 or 8 and move on. Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Ac