On 2010-04-13 17:29, sebb wrote:
> On 12/04/2010, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2010-04-12 21:21, sebb wrote:
>> > On 12/04/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >> > 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
>> >> > test
On 12/04/2010, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2010-04-12 21:21, sebb wrote:
> > On 12/04/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> > 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> >> > test directories, i.e. they are using:
> >>
On 2010-04-12 21:21, sebb wrote:
> On 12/04/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
>> > test directories, i.e. they are using:
>> >
>> >src/java
>> >src/test
>> >
>> > rath
On 12/04/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> > 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> > test directories, i.e. they are using:
> >
> >src/java
> >src/test
> >
> > rather than the default:
> >
> >src/main/
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> test directories, i.e. they are using:
>
>src/java
>src/test
>
> rather than the default:
>
>src/main/java
>src/test/java
>
> Do we want to fix those?
I think its be
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> Torsten Curdt wrote:
I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
for now for changing those.
>>> As much as I am for cross-project collaboratio
On 11/04/2010, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
> > Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >>> I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
> >>> classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
> >>> for now for changing those.
> >> As much as I am for
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
>>> classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
>>> for now for changing those.
>> As much as I am for cross-project collaboration this reason for a "-1"
>>
+1
On 2010-04-10 17:16, sebb wrote:
> 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> test directories, i.e. they are using:
>
> src/java
> src/test
>
> rather than the default:
>
> src/main/java
> src/test/java
>
> Do we want to fix those?
>
> This would
> /me Puts on Tomcat hat
>
> Don't worry about us. We work with specific versions and can handle any
> changes when we next to an upgrade.
See? :)
Thanks, Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addi
>>> I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
>>> classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
>>> for now for changing those.
>>
>> As much as I am for cross-project collaboration this reason for a "-1"
>> takes it a step too far IMO. If they reall
On 10/04/2010 17:33, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
for now for changing those.
As much as I am for cross-project collaboration this reason for a "-1"
takes it a step t
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
>> classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
>> for now for changing those.
>
> As much as I am for cross-project collaboration this reason for a "-1"
> takes it a step too far IM
aturday, April 10, 2010 08:17
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [ALL] Non-standard maven source and test directories
>
> 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> test directories, i.e. they are using:
>
> src/java
> src/test
>
> I think tomcat may still build repackaged versions of dbcp and pool
> classes from source and this change might break their builds. So -1
> for now for changing those.
As much as I am for cross-project collaboration this reason for a "-1"
takes it a step too far IMO. If they really want to keep
configuration has been changed in the experimental branch. I wouldn't bother
with trunk.
Ralph
On Apr 10, 2010, at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote:
> 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> test directories, i.e. they are using:
>
>src/java
>src/test
>
> rather than t
sebb wrote:
> 22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
> test directories, i.e. they are using:
>
> src/java
> src/test
>
> rather than the default:
>
> src/main/java
> src/test/java
>
> Do we want to fix those?
>
> This would involve renaming the dire
22 commons-proper projects are still using non-standard source and
test directories, i.e. they are using:
src/java
src/test
rather than the default:
src/main/java
src/test/java
Do we want to fix those?
This would involve renaming the directories, removing the entries from
the p
18 matches
Mail list logo
