[LANG] Fixing LANG-1197 (Was: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String)

2016-09-11 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Pascal, can you please elaborate what problems you ran into? Your approach of deprecating JAVA_1_9 looks promising to me. Regards, Benedikt -- Forwarded message - From: Pascal Schumacher Date: So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 20:13 Uhr Subject: Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String To

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-09-11 Thread Pascal Schumacher
I ran into that while taking a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1197 http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223 specifies the new versioning string schema, but I was not sure how add this to the current implementation (without breaking anything). Am 11.09.2016 um 18:31 schrieb Benedi

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-09-11 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, I've created LANG-1264 [1] to address this for Commons Lang's JavaVersion enum. Regards, Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1264 Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 15. Juli 2016 um 17:34 Uhr: > Thank you for the pointers. > > Gary > > On Jul 15, 2016 4:02 AM, "dalibor to

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you for the pointers. Gary On Jul 15, 2016 4:02 AM, "dalibor topic" wrote: > > > On 14.07.2016 20:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Thank you, I subscribed and asked a question out of curiosity... >> > > Please see > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/verona-dev/2016-May/000409.html in > g

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-15 Thread dalibor topic
On 14.07.2016 20:27, Gary Gregory wrote: Thank you, I subscribed and asked a question out of curiosity... Please see http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/verona-dev/2016-May/000409.html in general and http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/lang/Runtime.Version.html specificall

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-15 Thread dalibor topic
On 14.07.2016 20:05, Gary Gregory wrote: Am I blind or can someone point out how to comment on a JEP? Each JEP has a "Discussion" field pointing to the most appropriate mailing list to discuss it. The JEP is linked to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061493 but how do you get an

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you, I subscribed and asked a question out of curiosity... Gary On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > You can't comment on the tickets, but they do want your feedback on their > Verona message board: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/verona-dev > > Cheers,

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-14 Thread Matt Sicker
I noticed that you can't make an account there, too, when I wanted to report a javac bug. Plus, it would have been too convenient of a location to report JDK9 bugs during development apparently. On 14 July 2016 at 13:08, Paul Benedict wrote: > You can't comment on the tickets, but they do want y

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-14 Thread Paul Benedict
You can't comment on the tickets, but they do want your feedback on their Verona message board: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/verona-dev Cheers, Paul On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Am I blind or can someone point out how to comment on a JEP? The JEP is >

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Am I blind or can someone point out how to comment on a JEP? The JEP is linked to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061493 but how do you get an account on that? I recall hearing a preso on how the comments for Java were locked down for fear of too much feedback... or something. Gary On

[ALL] JDK 9 Version String

2016-07-14 Thread Paul Benedict
If this issue has been raised in the past, my apologies. I did a search for "Verona" in the mail archives here and didn't see any hit besides Oracle's own notification [1]. That was the only hit. In JDK 9, the version string is changing from 1.0.X to bigger numbers like 9.0.0 [2]. Code that has as