Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-10 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
Hi All, I appreciate all the interest and help. Following Matt's suggestion, I have a note out to my co-workers that are committers/chairs on the ActiveMQ, Camel and CXF project and am waiting for a response from them as well. I will follow up here when I have further details as well. Thank you

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-10 Thread Matt Benson
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > I would like to be involved with this once it has found a home. In this case maybe *you* are the Commons committer to "drive" the project in the sandbox?! :) Matt > > -Adrian > > > On 7/9/2012 9:12 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: >> >> He

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-10 Thread Adrian Crum
I would like to be involved with this once it has found a home. -Adrian On 7/9/2012 9:12 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: Hello, I have developed a new component for the Apache Camel project written using pure Java JMS APIs (the current component is a Spring JMS wrapper). There have been req

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-09 Thread Phil Steitz
On 7/9/12 2:08 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > I am still thinking this through... Commons policy permits any Apache > committer to start a sandbox component, but IMO it is tacitly implied > that the associated code come directly from the committer/s, or from > another Apache project. This implies that t

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-09 Thread Matt Benson
I am still thinking this through... Commons policy permits any Apache committer to start a sandbox component, but IMO it is tacitly implied that the associated code come directly from the committer/s, or from another Apache project. This implies that this development would either: - take place in

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-09 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
Matt is correct. I will ping my coworkers and see who would be available to help out and we will go from there. Thanks, Scott ES On Jul 9, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > If Scott were an Apache committer (he is not), that would be true. ;) > Instead, the situation is more complicated

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-09 Thread Matt Benson
If Scott were an Apache committer (he is not), that would be true. ;) Instead, the situation is more complicated. Is this component part of the current Camel codebase? If so (or even if not?), perhaps one or more of the Camel committers would care to manage the code in the Commons sandbox, from

Re: [ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
On 09/07/2012 22:12, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: > Hello, Hi Scott, > > I have developed a new component for the Apache Camel project written using > pure Java JMS APIs (the current component is a Spring JMS wrapper). There > have been requests made to make the API pulled out of the Camel com

[ALL] Commons JMS Project

2012-07-09 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
Hello, I have developed a new component for the Apache Camel project written using pure Java JMS APIs (the current component is a Spring JMS wrapper). There have been requests made to make the API pulled out of the Camel component and to place them in a commons project for use by other projects (