Re: [math] Initial TLP PMC membership and chair

2016-02-04 Thread Otmar Ertl
e > > decided to call "Apache Math" > > > > Bill Barker > > Otmar Ertl > > Gary Gregory > > Luc Maisonobe > > Thomas Neidhart > > Gilles Sadowski > > Phil Steitz > > > > We need to name an initial chair for the PMC. I will volu

Re: [math] Volunteer for the new TLP PMC

2016-02-02 Thread Otmar Ertl
It would be an honor to join. Otmar On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 2/1/16 6:27 AM, Gilles wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:22:30 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/24/16 1:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer int

Re: [math] [POLL] new TLP name

2016-02-01 Thread Otmar Ertl
Apache Math On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote: > Apache Epsilon > > > On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote: >> >> Apache Epsilon >> >> >>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names >>> for the n

Re: [VOTE] Form a separate TLP based on [math]

2016-01-16 Thread Otmar Ertl
+0 I am OK with this Otmar On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 5:46 PM, wrote: > Phil Steitz writes: >>The discussion has thus far been generally favorable. I would like >>therefore to put the proposal to split [math] out into a separate >>TLP to a VOTE. Assuming a favorable vote, we can discuss how to

Re: [math] Matrix parallel operations

2016-01-03 Thread Otmar Ertl
Am 03.01.2016 7:49 vorm. schrieb "Ole Ersoy" : > > Hi, > > I ran another test using a single parallel loop for array based matrix vector multiplication. Throughput almost tripled (Test pasted at bottom): > > # Run complete. Total time: 00:13:24 > > > Benchmark

Re: [math] Matrix parallel operations

2016-01-02 Thread Otmar Ertl
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Ole Ersoy wrote: > Hi, > > Hope ya'll are having an awesome new year! > > Some matrix operations, like createRealIdentityMatrix can be turned into one > liners like this: > >IntStream.range(0, dimension).forEach(i -> m.setEntry(i, i, 1.0)); > > And can be pe

Re: [2/2] [math] MATH-1285: added definition of distribution to javadoc of ZipfDistribution

2015-11-10 Thread Otmar Ertl
Thanks, good to know. Unfortunately, I used LogNormalDistribution as template. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi Otmar. > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:32:13 -, oe...@apache.org wrote: >> >> MATH-1285: added definition of distribution to javadoc of >> ZipfDistribution >> >> [...]

Re: [1/2] [math] MATH-1285: replaced inappropriate reference to MathWorld by reference to Wikipedia's article about Zipf's law, thanks to Pim van der Hoorn for reporting this issue

2015-10-27 Thread Otmar Ertl
repo >> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/commit/8ed2209b >> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/tree/8ed2209b >> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/diff/8ed2209b >> >> Branch: refs/heads/master >&

Re: [math] github pull requests

2015-08-25 Thread Otmar Ertl
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hello. > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:29:37 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> As the github pull request are not forwarded here, there are two new >> requests since yesterday: >> >> > > >

Re: [math] random boolean arrays

2015-07-13 Thread Otmar Ertl
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >

Re: [math] random boolean arrays

2015-07-13 Thread Otmar Ertl
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, 12 Ju

Re: [math] random boolean arrays

2015-07-12 Thread Otmar Ertl
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> >> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >>> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thom