On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 02/06/2009, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> Could be useful for parts of Commons Codec, Mail, Net.
>
> Seems to me it fits in with the Commons charter, and other projects
> that could benefit from it (e.g. Tomcat
Hi
Over at Apache MINA, we have voted in Vysper as a subproject. The
Vysper project came with a bunch of code for tracking compliance to a
specification (e.g. RFC) using a set of annotations. it also contains
an APT based tool for producing reports based on these annotations.
Here's the current co
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but they got to the mirrors already. I have removed them there, next
> time please notify <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for taking the time, we'll try not to screw up next time I guess :-)
/niklas
--
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two different artifactIDs for seemingly the same artifact, added by
> two different people in the same diff.
My bad, I used the build-helper-maven-plugin to get the FTP-only
client into the Maven lifecycle so that it will g
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Binaries and source jars are available from the usual download locations
> once replication has completed. Note that this release contains a cut-down
> FTP-only jar for clients who just need FTP functionality.
It doesn't se
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +-0/1 as you think fit, thanks!
Looks good to me. +1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
On 10/1/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
> >
> > META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
> >
> > ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
> >
>
> But is it correct?
>
> If not, will
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done!
Great, +1 on releasing.
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
You're right. You can disable this behavior with the following configuration:
maven-jar-plugin
2.2
false
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, sorry, I just realised that I have an older key in my key list which
> must be the default for signing. I've uploaded it to pgp.mit.edu and I will
> add it to the appropriate KEYS file as well.
Now find it at pgp.mit.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
I still can't seem to find the key used for signing the artifacts
(B6E5C0E2)., neither in:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
nor in:
https://svn.apache.or
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the examples should be pre-compiled at all. They are
> source code examples that demonstrate how to use the API. Unless
> something has changed recently, they are not intended as fully
> functional prog
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The RC for net-2.0 is available for review at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0
>
> Changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html#a2.0
>
> Can someone
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:56 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is generally agreed that a groupId of "org.apache.commons.*" would be
> better. However when changing the groupId it is necessary to also
> correctly deploy a "redirect" pom to tell maven that the groupId has
> been changed; fa
Hi
commons-net still uses "commons-net" as the groupId. Other commons
components (including the parent POM) seems to have changed to
org.apache.commons. Is there any reason for not making the same change
for net?
/niklas
-
To un
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The backward compatibility question
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
> suggestion to refactor the Commons Net "small protocol"
> implementations into separate packages each:
Oh, that was not my understanding. But since there
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Niklas Gustavsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I meant to say "
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby call a vote to promote commons-exec from commons sandbox to proper
+1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
> provide additional support if needed
I'm certainly one of those.
/niklas
---
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
As someone partially to blame for the code
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly are you having trouble with? What is "not working on
> linux"? What behavior are you seeing? Are you getting an exception?
> If so, can you provide a stack trace, please.
Venkar does state that he is seeing
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:00 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-220 is about thread safety
> of TftpServer.
>
> Can the patch be applied?
> I'm happy to do it.
Looks good to me. +1.
> I don't think NET 2.0 should be released without fixing this (either
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, bperquku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it is FTP (ftp service runing under AIX is called proftpd).
Then you'll have to do what James described. Either upload the file to
a different directory or name and then move it when done. FTP has as
far as I know no way
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:18 AM, bperquku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, name of the file is not relevant. The server process check for
> files (not for names) and is implemented by someone else (i dont have source
> code).
You didn't mention what protocol you are using, is it FTP?
/nik
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meant to say "out of the project". It was moved to test/ after the
> discussion.
Great, so it seems we agree :-) However, the class is still in
src/main, not in src/test:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ne
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had this discussion already (at great length). It's not going to
> test/src.
Search through the archives, I managed to find a discussion on this
very topic from March this year, however in the thread it seems like
yo
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:36 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you be able to try the patches I just attached to NET-220?
>
> That should be enough to make the TFTPServer class threadsafe, and may
> address the shutdown problem.
Didn't help with the issue I'm seeing.
When on the topic o
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/19/08, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would prefer to get 2.0 out there as well. I would rather see us be
>> fixing bugs as found by users than keeping it around for eve
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I saw the same error, but only once, so I assumed it was
> something else happening on my system.
>
> If it's occurring regularly, then there may be a problem with
> releasing the port from previous tests in the same class.
I would prefer to get 2.0 out there as well. I would rather see us be
fixing bugs as found by users than keeping it around for even longer
in the current state. It's time to get it out there.
/niklas
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:35 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think 1.5 is closer to being
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we ready to cut another RC? I can do so if you guys are happy with where
> we're at.
I still got this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-217
I haven't look into any depth at why it's happening, but chang
Hi
I just added the following issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-216
I would strongly prefer to have this included in the 2.0 release as
our test suite for FtpServer is currently broken on some JVMs due to
this.
/niklas
-
Hi
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
> tags and branches, but always get test failures.
Things have improved significantly on the 2.0 branch, thanks! Now I&#
Hi
I feel really bad about not giving commons-exec the love it needs.
Nice to see some additional testing going on with the code. Have you
found any bugs that need fixing?
Could we include these tests as part of the exec project? I would be
happy to help out with the integration if needed. In add
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How many CPUs does the system have?
It's a dual core laptop.
> I raised JIRA NET-213 to record the bug you reported.
Thanks!
> Do you see any problem with always using the default platform encoding
> when converting the line
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test failures:
> >
>
> which JVM are you using for this?
>
> I don
TelnetClientTest)
I would love to have a 2.0 release out, but it should build without
any test failures.
/niklas
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trunk (Java 1.3+)
>
> and
>
> branches/NET_2_0 (Java 1.5)
>
> have the most recent f
Hi
>From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
tags and branches, but always get test failures. Here's the summaries
and the relevant surefire reports are attached.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC3/
Tests in error:
testInitial(org.
39 matches
Mail list logo
