Re: [PARENT] release of pom packaging project fails jar plugin

2012-04-25 Thread Michael Heuer
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:57 AM, sebb wrote: > On 25 April 2012 17:54, Michael Heuer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 25 April 2012 07:48, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>>> Michael Heuer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jörg Schai

Re: [PARENT] release of pom packaging project fails jar plugin

2012-04-25 Thread Michael Heuer
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 AM, sebb wrote: > On 25 April 2012 07:48, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Michael Heuer wrote: >> >>> Jörg Schaible wrote: >>>> Michael Heuer wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm forwarding this message originally sent to

Re: [PARENT] release of pom packaging project fails jar plugin

2012-04-24 Thread Michael Heuer
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Michael Heuer wrote: > >> I'm forwarding this message originally sent to users@maven that >> received no response.  Perhaps dev@commons is more appropriate. > > why do you think, that extending from Apache Commons parent is a good thing? > T

[PARENT] release of pom packaging project fails jar plugin

2012-04-24 Thread Michael Heuer
Hello, I'm forwarding this message originally sent to users@maven that received no response. Perhaps dev@commons is more appropriate. -- Forwarded message -- To: us...@maven.apache.org Hello, We have adapted the Commons parent pom (and by extension the Apache parent pom) with

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Michael Heuer
> Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: > http://people.

Re: [CLI] Simple usage message

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Heuer
Jim Jagielski wrote: > There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people > to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of > course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage > message they also get a superfluous "Missing required" note as well...

Re: [all] Generics and Return Type?

2008-04-09 Thread Michael Heuer
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Antonio Petrelli wrote: > 2008/4/9, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Does anyone have code that can take care of this situation: > > > > List strings = new ArrayList(); > > > > Class returnType = getReturnType(strings.getClass(), "get", int.class); > > > > I want the "r

RE: [math] Genetic Algorithms

2008-03-30 Thread Michael Heuer
Here's an framework for evolutionary algorithms (EA not GA) > http://dishevelled.org/evolve Generic in the sense that individuals don't need be "chromosomes"; mutation, recombination, and selection are provided through functors. LGPL version 3, but I am the only contributor. michael On Su

Re: [math] MATH-195, MATH-193 and pending release VOTE

2008-02-21 Thread Michael Heuer
Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Phil Steitz a ?crit : > > The 1.2 release VOTE is about to close, but during the vote these two > > issues have been opened. > > > > I have looked at both of these issues and am personally comfortable > > with marking them as either for 2.0 or WONTFIX (most likely for > > MA

Re: [VOTE] Release math 1.2 (second attempt)

2008-02-19 Thread Michael Heuer
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Phil Steitz wrote: > This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2. > > The zips / tars are here: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/ > > The site included in the binary distro is here: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/docs/ > > Release notes: > http

Re: [math] 1.2-RC1 available for review

2008-02-12 Thread Michael Heuer
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Phil Steitz wrote: > The zips / tars are here: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC1/ > > The site included in the binary distro is here: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC1/docs/ > > Release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC1/RELEA

[performance] feedback/suggestions

2007-08-05 Thread Michael Heuer
Hello Phil, I saw a few more commits this weekend on [performance] and thought you might welcome a bit of feedback: Use System.nanoTime() instead of System.currentTimeMillis()? In LoadGenerator execute() ex.awaitTermination(...) may throw an InterruptedException, you may wish to catch that befor