Re: Proposed fluent string utils

2016-05-19 Thread Micha Pringle
community. Let me know what you have in mind. Cheers,Micha From: Benedikt Ritter To: Commons Developers List ; Micha Pringle Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 3:09 AM Subject: Re: Proposed fluent string utils Hello Micha, Micha Pringle schrieb am Mo., 16. Mai 2016 um 03:18 Uhr: Hi Matt

Re: Proposed fluent string utils

2016-05-15 Thread Micha Pringle
ther Lang related fluent APIs to it). > > I'd suggest renaming to fluengLang :) > I would add that I personally would have no problem with a compile time only annotation dependency. Matt > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > > > Hello again, &g

Re: Proposed fluent string utils

2015-11-16 Thread Micha Pringle
package or the like? As for unit testing, do you want me to test all the delegating methods as well? It seems like a lot of work for nominal gain. Thanks again. Cheers,Micha From: Benedikt Ritter To: Commons Developers List ; Micha Pringle Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:00 AM Subjec

Re: Proposed fluent string utils

2015-11-14 Thread Micha Pringle
I really apologize, it seems the link below still managed to include a period despite my best efforts. Please tryhttps://github.com/michapringle/fluentStringUtils Cheers,Micha From: Micha Pringle To: "dev@commons.apache.org" Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:44 PM Subject

Proposed fluent string utils

2015-11-14 Thread Micha Pringle
Hi folks, Firstly, apologies if this results in a double post. I tried posting a couple of times, but the first time I sent to the user list (sorry), and the second time I do not see my email at all in the mail archive (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201511.mbox/thread).