Re: [ALL] Change deployment override in Commons Parent Pom

2010-05-28 Thread Donald Woods
The distributionManagement overrides should be removed once Nexus is being use, as the apache-7.pom defines these. You want to push everything to Nexus (except maven sites), so SNAPSHOTs automatically show up in the snapshot repo and any release artifacts will automatically go into a staging repo,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2010-01-21 Thread Donald Woods
C and we'll revisit where the podling lands at graduation time. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal Thanks, Donald On 12/1/09 2:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> Is the voting complete? If so, can you post the Resu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-10 Thread Donald Woods
OK, I'll kick-off the discussion later today. -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the d...@common

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-09 Thread Donald Woods
They were all sitting in the spam folder in Yahoo mail. Sorry for that. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the d...@commons list and directly to me, but none

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-09 Thread Donald Woods
Sorry guys. Guess using my Yahoo mail and Thunderbird for list subscriptions was a bad idea I've been seeing other posts to the d...@commons list and directly to me, but none about this thread until today for some reason Niall, let me know if you need any help collecting the source t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall, any update on the voting? -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Is the voting complete? If so, can you post the Results to the dev list, so we can start discussing the proposal on the incubator@ list? Thanks for driving this! -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:13 PM

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-01 Thread Donald Woods
Is the voting complete? If so, can you post the Results to the dev list, so we can start discussing the proposal on the incubator@ list? Thanks for driving this! -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Niall Pem

Re: Draft proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation incubator podling

2009-11-24 Thread Donald Woods
within the next weeks), i can't say how much time i'll be able to spend on it. regards, gerhard 2009/11/18 Donald Woods mailto:dwo...@apache.org>> We have an initial draft proposal to create a JSR-303 Bean Validation implementation at Apache as an incubator podling.

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-20 Thread Donald Woods
, best regards Simone On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Donald Woods wrote: I'm sure we'll get a few more interested committers from Geronimo and OpenJPA. Was just waiting until we had an initial proposal draft completed before posting it to those dev lists. I'll go ahead an

Draft proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation incubator podling

2009-11-18 Thread Donald Woods
We have an initial draft proposal to create a JSR-303 Bean Validation implementation at Apache as an incubator podling. Take a look at the proposal [1] and feel free to ask questions about it on the d...@commons list and volunteer to be an initial committer if you have time and interests in be

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Donald Woods
te in the next week or two, as we can try to get the podling approved before the Dec. holiday season begins. -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Donald Woods wrote: OK, I finished my first rounds of updates. If we want Apache Commons to be sponsor then w

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-18 Thread Donald Woods
OK, I finished my first rounds of updates. Looks like we just need to nail down a champion and we can add more mentors once we propose it to the incubator -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: Lets start a proposal on the incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ I've set up a ske

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
t the way Nial started. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-02 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it's fine if we repurpose it, see VALIDATOR-279. As far as the API,

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-27 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it's

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-27 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it's fine if we repurpose it, see VALIDATOR-279. As far as the API, we already have a clean room copy of the 1.0 GA API created over in the Apach

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-26 Thread Donald Woods
to start a clean room implementation as Niall suggested ? On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it's fine if we repurpose it, see VALIDATOR-279. As far as the API, we already have a clean room copy of the 1.0 GA A

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-26 Thread Donald Woods
Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it's fine if we repurpose it, see VALIDATOR-279. As far as the API, we already have a clean room copy of the 1.0 GA API created over in the Apache Geronimo Specs subproject [1], with the other Java EE spec APIs we ship, so I'd be -1 on cre

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Donald Woods
Thanks for the input. I'd prefer to continue using the validator2 sandbox, so other Commons committers and users will be aware of the project and provide help/reviews when they can. -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-06 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around creating a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 Bean Validation spec [2] and [3]. Since JSR-303 is now a required component

[VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-04 Thread Donald Woods
release in 2010 for a Java EE 6 application server. -Donald Woods Apache Geronimo Committer and PMC member Apache OpenJPA Committer and PMC member dwoods.AT.apache.org [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-279 [2] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 [3] http://people.redhat.com

Re: svn commit: r799007 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk: LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt

2009-07-29 Thread Donald Woods
The NOTICE file needs to include a complete copy of any third-party conditions and not just a link to them. See the W3C notice in the Geronimo server [1] for how to handle cases where the license states - "...must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following dis

Re: svn commit: r770203 [2/3] - in /commons/sandbox/validator2/trunk: LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt

2009-05-01 Thread Donald Woods
Sorry, I had grabbed a License file from Geronimo, which had additional licenses attached. It's fixed now in Rev770747 by using the license file from validator 1.4-SNAPSHOT, which doesn't include any additions. -Donald sebb wrote: On 30/04/2009, dwo...@apache.org wrote: Added: commons/s

Re: [Validator] Request for Sandbox committer access

2009-04-30 Thread Donald Woods
Thanks. -Donald Henri Yandell wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Donald, Donald Woods wrote: Any questions? I'm already implementing the API over in Geronimo - https://issues.apache.org/jira/b

Re: [Validator] Request for Sandbox committer access

2009-04-29 Thread Donald Woods
pache Labs. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Hi, as per this thread - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/102683 I was wondering if I could have commit access to the Commons Validator sandbox, to help out with the JSR-303 Bean Validation implementation, to go along with th

[Validator] Request for Sandbox committer access

2009-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
/user/UserNodes.jtp?user=166296 and my recent Geronimo activity on Nabble - http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?query=dwoods&sort=date&local=y&forum=136 Thanks, Donald Woods - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commo