ction in the oacl.reflect
> package. Thoughts on [lang] 3.0 moving to Java 5
> source level?
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
the tests should go into the trunk
code even if the solution ends up changing around a bit.
Any news?
-AZ
--
Aaron Zeckoski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Research Engineer - CARET - Cambridge University
[http://bugs.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/~aaronz/]
Sakai Fellow - [http://aaronz
Sorry, here is the link to the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-312
-AZ
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Aaron Zeckoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created a patch against beanutils trunk (now that I can get to
> svn again) and attached it to the fo
g this list with a reminder every couple of
> days. If none of the regular beanutils maintainers respond within a week
> or so, then I am sure someone (maybe me) will review and commit your patch.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> Aaron Zeckoski schrieb:
>
>
> > Someon
Someone let me know if this is the wrong list or if I am going about
this the wrong way please. :-)
Thanks
-AZ
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Aaron Zeckoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies if this is the wrong list for this.
>
> We have an extension to commons beanutils
this if that is the better way to go about it
but I thought I would see what people thought first. Would this be
generally useful?
Thanks
-AZ
P.S. If this is not worth discussing and I should just go to JIRA for
this please just let me know. :-)
--
Aaron Zeckoski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior
