Hi Siegfried,
Sorry to hear that you are going emeritus.
I recall I met you in Atlanta at a food-truck lunch. You showed me how
I should behave in what I was doing in some projects. I also recall
that you told me how Turbine got started. Lessons, priceless.
Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Woonsan
I remember those Turbine days! We’ll miss you, and the door is more then open
to have you come back as things evolve/change!
> On Feb 13, 2025, at 8:06 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>
> Hi Siggi,
>
>> Am 12.02.2025 um 20:57 schrieb Siegfried Goeschl
>> :
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> after long & car
Yes
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13.02.2025, at 14:12, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>
> Hi Siggi,
>
>> Am 12.02.2025 um 20:57 schrieb Siegfried Goeschl
>> :
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> after long & careful consideration I decided to become an emeritus member.
>> The good news is, that it has nothing to w
Hi.
Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 14:42, Xeno Amess a écrit :
>
> I really worried about if our repos can even runs in a same jvm(I mean
> normally, not osgi or shading)
> Maybe a commons-bom repo and monthly release be useful? Gary what do you
> think?
Please provide more details, and perhaps a speci
Hi All,
[Piotr, Arnout, please correct me and clarify or refine what's below.]
Apache Commons publishes SBOMs using the Maven plugins for SPDX and CycloneDX.
We currently publish hashes and versions for dependencies in these
SBOMs which will not be the case in the future as it is not the role
of
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 01:58, Xeno Amess wrote:
>
> > AFAICT the same problem does not apply to VFS, which is a multi-module
> project.
> because vfs has its all modules snapshot on snapshot repository (
As an experiment, I tried changing the snapshot version to
2.10.99-SNAPSHOT, which does not e
Hi Siggi,
> Am 12.02.2025 um 20:57 schrieb Siegfried Goeschl
> :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> after long & careful consideration I decided to become an emeritus member.
> The good news is, that it has nothing to with the ASF itself (and all of the
> lengthy email threads). Having said that, I have nothi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:22 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki
wrote:
> We are looking at collections4 as a possibility, but haven't determined if
> we can upgrade yet.
>
That sounds reasonable.
> The main issue is COLLECTIONS-701which is flagged by security scanners:
>
> ```
> The framework Apache Commo
This release vote passes with the following +1 votes:
- Gary Gregory (ggregory, binding)
- melloware...@gmail.com (non-binding)
- Henri Biestro (binding, henrib)
- Piotr P. Karwasz (binding, pkarwasz)
TY all,
Gary
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:08 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 31.01
Hi Gary,
On 31.01.2025 16:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
I che
Hi Gary,
On 3.02.2025 00:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
The ha
Am 12.02.2025 um 16:22 schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki:
We are looking at collections4 as a possibility, but haven't determined if we
can upgrade yet.
The main issue is COLLECTIONS-701which is flagged by security scanners:
```
The framework Apache Commons Collections before 4.3 is vulnerable to St
12 matches
Mail list logo
