> Am 14.12.2024 um 12:00 schrieb Piotr P. Karwasz :
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 9.12.2024 17:37, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> c) try using this on a class which contains e.g. an ArrayList, a Set or a
>> Map. It will e.g. use List#equals() which also does equals() on it's items
>> (btw, I explained this to
Hi Gary,
On 15.12.2024 16:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
* The
I'm not sure Sun/Oracle ever formally specified this behavior, but as a JVM
engineer since Java 0.98 I can attest to it. This behavior is also
described in JEP-280: "Currently javac translates String concatenation into
StringBuilder::append chains" (referring to Java 8).
The advantages of using St
What performance tests are define to help in determining before and after
performance improvements?
Eric Bresie
ebre...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 9:08 AM Serw wrote:
> Dear Apache Commons Community,
>
> In my recent PR #1332, I replaced a StringBuilder usage with string
> concatenation
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM Peter Burka wrote:
>
> Before Java 9, javac always generated StringBuilder calls for string
> concatenation (or StringBuffer prior to Java 2). Using + is less verbose,
> generates the same code, is more readable, and, when we do finally bump the
> compile target, wi
Since Apache Commons Collections 4.5.0-M2 was released, we have fixed
a few bugs and added enhancements, so I would like to release Apache
Commons Collections 4.5.0-M3.
Apache Commons Collections 4.5.0-M3 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/collecti
Before Java 9, javac always generated StringBuilder calls for string
concatenation (or StringBuffer prior to Java 2). Using + is less verbose,
generates the same code, is more readable, and, when we do finally bump the
compile target, will generate better code.
Peter
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024, 7:13 AM
Thanks. In that case I'm -1 on this since it is not available in Java
8, and even in Java 9 is only possible, not necessarily implemented.
We can revisit in a few years if the JDK has moved on by then.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 1:05 AM Peter Burka wrote:
>
> I presume this is referring to
> https:
