Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?

If not done in new classes (both can live in the same lib technically), sadly yes. Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 20:14, Richard Zowalla a écrit : > Thanks for your replies. > > I guess, that switching the namespace leads to binary incompatibility (If > I take the definition from [1]). I cannot drop it

Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?

Thanks for your replies. I guess, that switching the namespace leads to binary incompatibility (If I take the definition from [1]). I cannot drop it in a running JVM / app and expect no issues with it as the related APIs are breaking namespace changes (at least at runtime if they aren't presen

Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?

On 16/12/2022 13:24, Gary Gregory wrote: Thank you Richard for starting this thread. My view is simpler perhaps: I would not make this about the javax vs Jakarta namespaces. I don't want to double the numbers of jars we produce from the same branch for affected components as one of the scheme p

Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?

Thank you Richard for starting this thread. My view is simpler perhaps: I would not make this about the javax vs Jakarta namespaces. I don't want to double the numbers of jars we produce from the same branch for affected components as one of the scheme proposed. It feels like a burden to maintena

Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?

-1 for c and d, +1 for a, guess b can still be an option for ~2 years before switching to a Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | Linked

Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?

Hi all, based on the discussion [1] for DBCP, I wanted to start a discussion whether and how the Apache Commons project might/want to support the Jakarta namespace changes. I know, that not all commons projects are impacted by the namespaces change, but we should make sure, that users can use rel

Re: [Dbutils] PR merges build

Ping. Gary On Fri, Dec 9, 2022, 06:50 Gary Gregory wrote: > -1 to the commit or PR that broke the build. To whomever merged it, please > revert. > > Before you merge a PR, if you are uncertain that it is safe, test it > locally. > > Gary >