Re: [all] release validation

2020-07-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2020-07-12, Rob Tompkins wrote: > given the consistency of the signatures from the plugins…do we need to > check them for releases anymore? Yes, please. Not everybody uses the plugins and even if everybody did a misconfiguration could be pulling in the wrong key or a key not available from the

[all] release validation (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2)

2020-07-12 Thread Rob Tompkins
given the consistency of the signatures from the plugins…do we need to check them for releases anymore? I have been using shell scripts to validate all of the md5’s, sha1’s, sha512’s, and gpg signatures that come out of the process. @sebb or @markt do you have an opinion here? -Rob > On Jul 12

Re: [exec] Update from Java 5 to 6

2020-07-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I am ok with Java 8 as the requirement. Gary On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 06:16 T. Schapitz wrote: > Hi there, > > maybe a bit late in the game, because the original post regarding this > topic was 9 months ago, but i think there is a good case for skipping > directly to JDK 8: > > If we opt for utili

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC2

2020-07-12 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons Lang 3.10 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Lang 3.11. Apache Commons Lang 3.11 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/3.11-RC2 (svn

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC1

2020-07-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 8:53 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > After some very minor changes and citation additions to the javadoc. I > think we’re likely ready. > Thank Rob, I'll roll RC2. Gary > > Cheers, > -Rob > > > On Jul 11, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > Not fully baked, cance

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.11 based on RC1

2020-07-12 Thread Rob Tompkins
After some very minor changes and citation additions to the javadoc. I think we’re likely ready. Cheers, -Rob > On Jul 11, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Not fully baked, cancelling due to an issue discovered by Rob. > > Gary > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:58 PM Gary Gregory wrote

Re: [exec] Update from Java 5 to 6

2020-07-12 Thread Xeno Amess
for 1.5 to 1.6: Seems only 1.6 users can benefit from that...does it worth? for 1.5 to 1.8: GREAATE! +1 for it. T. Schapitz 于2020年7月12日周日 下午6:16写道: > Hi there, > > maybe a bit late in the game, because the original post regarding this > topic was 9 months ago, but i think there is a g

[exec] Update from Java 5 to 6

2020-07-12 Thread T. Schapitz
Hi there, maybe a bit late in the game, because the original post regarding this topic was 9 months ago, but i think there is a good case for skipping directly to JDK 8: If we opt for utilizing not only the java.lang.ProcessBuilder introduced in JDK 1.5, but also the additional methods for stream