On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:39:05 -0800, Eric Barnhill wrote:
For the line:
Assert.assertFalse(zero.equals(Double.valueOf(0)));
What is it testing?
Conceptually, I'd expect "assertTrue" (zero as a fraction
is equal to zero as a double).
Eclipse is producing a warning:
"Unlikely argument type fo
Hi Eric.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:20:12 -0800, Eric Barnhill wrote:
Right now BigFraction and Fraction are separate parallel classes.
I propose altering this so that BigFraction extends Fraction,
overrides its
methods, but also keeps its own unique methods.
I think it would be an improvement t
Thank you Rob for taking care of this.
Gary
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018, 14:03 Rob Tompkins I’ve submitted the jira’s to INFRA for all of the following except [math],
> [numbers], [rng], and [statistics] which IIRC @Gilles sorted out for us
> (many thanks there)
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
>
> > On Dec 13, 2018
I’ve submitted the jira’s to INFRA for all of the following except [math],
[numbers], [rng], and [statistics] which IIRC @Gilles sorted out for us (many
thanks there)
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> This vote passes with the following +1’s:
>
> Stefan Bode
For the line:
Assert.assertFalse(zero.equals(Double.valueOf(0)));
Eclipse is producing a warning:
"Unlikely argument type for equals(): Double seems to be unrelated to
Fraction"
Does anyone have a suggestion for how to handle this warning, thank you.
Eric
Right now BigFraction and Fraction are separate parallel classes.
I propose altering this so that BigFraction extends Fraction, overrides its
methods, but also keeps its own unique methods.
I think it would be an improvement to the API to have both classes share
the same interface (and indeed an
Hi All,
I am looking for opinions on turning a CSV record into a list, as opposed
to the minimal current implementation. There would be side-effects like a
record becoming writable instead of read-only as the current implementation.
Memory footprint would also be a concern.
Please see https://gi
Hi.
[See below, the rejected announce mail for Commons RNG v1.2.]
Release candidates were generated with the "release-plugin".[1]
The "xml" template files were generated using
$ mvn -Prelease commons-build:download-page
Please advise on the appropriate incantations (that would lead
to the down
This vote passes with the following +1’s:
Stefan Bodewig,
Pascal Schumacher,
Ethan Adler,
Sebb,
Gary Gregory,
Oliver Heger,
Eric Barnhill,
Matt Sicker,
Jochen Wiedmann,
and with
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f7af4a106b6479970156959b31a73a26b4255e5ec2913e85aae547b@%3Cdev.commons.apache.o
