[GitHub] darkma773r opened a new pull request #16: GEOMETRY-14: Adding Transform Classes

2018-12-10 Thread GitBox
darkma773r opened a new pull request #16: GEOMETRY-14: Adding Transform Classes URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/16 Adding AffineTransformMatrix?D, QuaternionRotation, and AxisAngleSequence classes. Removing previous Rotation class. -

Re: Move fileupload to Gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > > In light of Rob Tompkins proposal to move all, I retract my suggestion. No stress. Maybe we should tackle that next after this move. -Rob > >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:25 PM Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Go for it :-) and thank y

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 2:18 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 19:11, Jochen Wiedmann >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> And, may I suggest, that we add bcel, beanutils, etc. (those still in >> svn) to the list? > > -1 > > I don't think it's a good idea to mix the two moves, as they are ve

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 1:51 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Though if it helps move things faster, I already held this vote a while > ago: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f7af4a106b6479970156959b31a73a26b4255e5ec2913e85aae547b@%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E Whoops. Good

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread sebb
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 19:11, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > +1 > > And, may I suggest, that we add bcel, beanutils, etc. (those still in > svn) to the list? -1 I don't think it's a good idea to mix the two moves, as they are very different. Let's get the Git repos sorted out first. > On Mon, Dec

Re: Move fileupload to Gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
In light of Rob Tompkins proposal to move all, I retract my suggestion. On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:25 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > Go for it :-) and thank you. > > Gary > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:58 AM Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > as a followup to [1] I'd like to move fileupload to

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 And, may I suggest, that we add bcel, beanutils, etc. (those still in svn) to the list? On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:51 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Though if it helps move things faster, I already held this vote a while > ago: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f7af4a106b

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 (non-binding) Though if it helps move things faster, I already held this vote a while ago: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f7af4a106b6479970156959b31a73a26b4255e5ec2913e85aae547b@%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 11:13, Eric Barnhill wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Dec 9, 201

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Eric Barnhill
+1 On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 AM Oliver Heger wrote: > +1 > > Oliver > > Am 08.12.2018 um 21:09 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > > Infra stated that we need documented consensus on this. So, let’s have > at it. > > > > I propose that we move the following repos over to gitbox: > > > > commons-build-plug

Re: Move fileupload to Gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Go for it :-) and thank you. Gary On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:58 AM Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > as a followup to [1] I'd like to move fileupload to Gitbox. (It's > better to know in advance, so that pointers to the repository can be > adjusted, rather than react later on.) > > If noone inter

Move fileupload to Gitbox

2018-12-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, as a followup to [1] I'd like to move fileupload to Gitbox. (It's better to know in advance, so that pointers to the repository can be adjusted, rather than react later on.) If noone intervenes within three days, I'll file a Jira issue. Jochen 1: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71d66

Re: [Vote] RC2 for releasing Commons RNG v1.2

2018-12-10 Thread Alex Herbert
+0.5 (just the issue with the table in the user manual) That's a tough mark for just one typo! ;-) I'm new to this. I can change to a +1 but I think the site should be fixed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@c

Fwd: Re: [Vote] RC2 for releasing Commons RNG v1.2

2018-12-10 Thread Gilles
[Forwarding to ML.] Original Message Subject: Re: [Vote] RC2 for releasing Commons RNG v1.2 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:12:33 +0100 From: Gilles To: Alex Herbert On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:54:28 +, Alex Herbert wrote: On 06/12/2018 17:15, Gilles wrote: Maven artifacts' SHA-5