On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 08:06:36 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
IMO, let's stick with 1.0-alpha1. There is no need to rush the new
API and
this will make the code available to all through Maven repos.
Hopefully
once the code is more easy to use from builds, we will get more
feedback.
What if there are
IMO, let's stick with 1.0-alpha1. There is no need to rush the new API and
this will make the code available to all through Maven repos. Hopefully
once the code is more easy to use from builds, we will get more feedback.
Gary
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 12:17 AM Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
> >The rele
I can’t see why not to do this.
+1 to the idea
> On Nov 4, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Otto Fowler wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On November 3, 2018 at 10:55:08, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> I propose we update the Java requirement for [vfs] from Java 7 to Java 8.
>
> Gary
-
+1
On November 3, 2018 at 10:55:08, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com)
wrote:
I propose we update the Java requirement for [vfs] from Java 7 to Java 8.
Gary
