+1 to release as-is and postpone POOL-355, then +1 to Java8 later too
CheersBruno
From: Gary Gregory
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2018 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [pool] how to move to Java8?
My view is to skip POOL-355 and release the current code still, on Java
Note that as of EasyMock 4.0.1, our Java 11 problems are no longer. Details
are here:
https://github.com/easymock/easymock/issues/230#issuecomment-434065370
I've updated svn trunk to EasyMock 4.0.1.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:15 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> I updated from EasyMock 3.6 to 4.0,
You are indeed and thank you very much for this feedback!
I gave up on pushing fraction through GitHub and have pushed my first round
of changes via Apache. They are available on the branch fraction-dev for
inspection. I will incorporate the rest of your suggestions on my next
iteration.
Eric
O
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/91
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/19787137)
Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 97.876% when pulling
**60bed4374a2db82bc784
GitHub user drajakumar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/91
TEXT-127 Detect when a variable is unknown in StringSubstitutor
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/drajakumar/commons-text
GitHub user august782 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/68
Output all parameters in ReversedLinesFileReaderTestParamFile
In ReversedLinesFileReaderTestParamFile, the parameterized tests have three
parameters, but currently the test class is configured
I'm fine with sticking with Java 7 for Tomcat as long as the Jenkins build
continues to work properly. Keep an eye on the JDKs available! ;)
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 10:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> changes.xml is hand crafted and used to generate parts of the site.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 a
changes.xml is hand crafted and used to generate parts of the site.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:26 AM Mark Struberg
wrote:
> Yes, was not sure whether the changes.xml is generated or hand crafted.
> Gonna add the missing bits.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 29.10.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Gary
Yes, was not sure whether the changes.xml is generated or hand crafted.
Gonna add the missing bits.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.10.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> My view is to skip POOL-355 and release the current code still, on Java
> 7, as 2.6.1, or 2.7.0 if a new feature has been added,
My view is to skip POOL-355 and release the current code still, on Java
7, as 2.6.1, or 2.7.0 if a new feature has been added, which is not clear
since it seems changes.xml has not been updated for the commits over the
last week or two.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:49 AM Mark Struberg
wrote:
Thank you Rob for shepherding this release!
Gary
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:35 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> This [VOTE] thread passes with votes from (in order of appearance):
>
> Gary Gregory: +1,
> Rob Tompkins: +1, and
> Bruno Kinoshita: +1.
>
> I will perform the release activities now and will
Hi Mark,
I think you should give RM'ing a shot. We have a nice new release plugin
that helps a lot. Rob is planning on refining the Commons release docs, if
he has not already done so.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 01:02 Mark Struberg wrote:
> Txs gary!
>
> When will there be a new reelase run?
>
I've went through the list and pretty much the only ticket which was left to
really benefit from it would be the getMaxNumActive() (POOL-355).
But as noted there: after a bit of thinking through it I'm even tempted to
close it as won't fix. Having just a bare maxNumActive doesn't give you much
i
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 7:24 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 28, 2018, at 8:04 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
>>
>> Will cancel the vote tonight, thanks for spotting that @Gary.
>>
>> @Rob, thanks a lot for all the great work on the new plugin. I might be able
>> to roll a new RC to
This [VOTE] thread passes with votes from (in order of appearance):
Gary Gregory: +1,
Rob Tompkins: +1, and
Bruno Kinoshita: +1.
I will perform the release activities now and will send the release
announcement tomorrow.
Many thanks for the validations,
-Rob
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 10:10 PM, Ro
> On Oct 28, 2018, at 8:04 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
>
> Will cancel the vote tonight, thanks for spotting that @Gary.
>
> @Rob, thanks a lot for all the great work on the new plugin. I might be able
> to roll a new RC tonight, or during this week. Would you have a pointer to
> the some
On 28/10/18 11:09, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
> I've worked through the open POOL tickets and found a few tickets which would
> like to enhance a few of our interfaces.
> E.g. in POOL-355 we have a request to add a new method getMaxNumActive() to
> the ObjectPool interface.
> Now this would
Txs gary!
When will there be a new reelase run?
If it's worth I could also do the release manager IF the project is properly
set up.
Means if it's a straight forward maven release then I gonna run it the same as
my other dozen ASF projects.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 28.10.2018 um 15:29 schrieb Gar
18 matches
Mail list logo
