> On Aug 29, 2018, at 7:16 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 5:41 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 29, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
>>> I have opened and resolved [1]. I classified this as a bug. Should we
>>> consider a 1.4.1 release or just leave t
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 5:41 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> >
> > I have opened and resolved [1]. I classified this as a bug. Should we
> > consider a 1.4.1 release or just leave the master version at
> 1.5-SNAPSHOT?
>
> I can do either. Seems like
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> I have opened and resolved [1]. I classified this as a bug. Should we
> consider a 1.4.1 release or just leave the master version at 1.5-SNAPSHOT?
I can do either. Seems like a good move before [parent] v48. Thoughts?
-Rob
> It appears I
I have opened and resolved [1]. I classified this as a bug. Should we
consider a 1.4.1 release or just leave the master version at 1.5-SNAPSHOT?
It appears I can do the weaver release using a locally overridden snapshot
build of the plugin, so I don't think I'm blocked (or worse, forced to do
thing
We do not have hard rules for betas AFAIK. IMO, only a beta can depend on
another beta, for example see HttpComponents. We should not release a
non-beta that depends on a beta. I think breaking BC is to be expected in
an alpha and less so in a beta. Changing package names and coordinates from
one b
[This announcement is only going to the dev list.]
The Apache Commons Release Plugin team is pleased to announce the release of
Apache
Commons Release Plugin 1.4.
The Apache Commons Release Plugin is a collection of Java based Maven mojos for
Apache Commons
Release process. These mojos are intend
Hello.
Do you have an idea of what it would take to automate "beta"
releases?
By this I mean: take a component (at some state) and create
a branch (with all the necessary adaptations) to become an
official release.
Are "beta" releases subject to the same BC requirements as
"ordinary" ones? Con
Am Di., 28. Aug. 2018 um 18:52 Uhr schrieb Pascal Schumacher <
pascalschumac...@gmx.net>:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> not sure if anything is gained this change.
>
> It is already possible use lambda expressions or method references
> instead of ThreadPredicate/ThreadGroupPredicate.
>
> Users will have to
This [LAZY][VOTE] passes with +1’s from Gary as well as myself. I will perform
the release processing.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 9:56 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
> Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.3 was relea
Here’s my +1.
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 9:56 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
> Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.3 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons Release Plugin 1.4.
>
> Apache Commons Release Plugin
10 matches
Mail list logo