On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 10:57:17 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>>
>> I think we KISS it for the next release: let's not worry about
>> multi-module
>> projects. One bite at a time ;-)
>>
>
> Maybe I'm missing something (Should I have up
+1 to Java 8
Gary
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, 10:36 Matt Sicker wrote:
> There's no need to switch to 2.0 just to upgrade Java. A 2.0 branch would
> only be relevant for API changes.
>
> On 5 June 2018 at 11:18, Scott Langley wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Have you decided whether you will now switch de
There's no need to switch to 2.0 just to upgrade Java. A 2.0 branch would
only be relevant for API changes.
On 5 June 2018 at 11:18, Scott Langley wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Have you decided whether you will now switch development to the 2.0 branch
> or otherwise begin accepting Java 8 code in order to
Hello.
Have you decided whether you will now switch development to the 2.0 branch
or otherwise begin accepting Java 8 code in order to take advantage of new
language features?
Thanks.
Scott Langley
Thanks Damjan,
For the hint. I'll try it.
Juergen
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> You can make a BufferedImage with TYPE_USHORT_GRAY for 16 bits per sample.
>
> Damjan
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:15 AM Juergen Stumpe wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need to write gra
You can make a BufferedImage with TYPE_USHORT_GRAY for 16 bits per sample.
Damjan
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:15 AM Juergen Stumpe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to write grayscale pixels with 16 bits per sample into a Tiff file.
>
> In the provided Apache examples the Imaging.writeImage() method i
Hello,
I need to write grayscale pixels with 16 bits per sample into a Tiff file.
In the provided Apache examples the Imaging.writeImage() method is
used to write image data into a file. But the image data source has
always to be a BufferedImage, however BufferedImage handles only 8
bits per samp
