Re: [lang] Fix up component id

2017-11-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you SebB! Gary On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:40 PM, wrote: > Repository: commons-lang > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master e863dcb2e -> 5aed9abe1 > > > Fix up component id > > mvn commons:download-page -Dcommons.release.version=3.7 > -Dcommons.componentid=lang > > Project: http://git-wip

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #43: COMMONSRDF-49: Make AbstractRDFParser serializable

2017-11-13 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43 All I did was point out that it isn't logically serializable at all points in its usage. My suggestion is that there is design with a builder (serializable) and instance (not serializable)

[GitHub] commons-rdf pull request #44: COMMONSRDF-70: Upgrade Jena version to 3.5.0

2017-11-13 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/44 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #44: COMMONSRDF-70: Upgrade Jena version to 3.5.0

2017-11-13 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/44 👍 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #44: COMMONSRDF-70: Upgrade Jena version to 3.5.0

2017-11-13 Thread wikier
Github user wikier commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/44 Now I think this should definitively go in `0.5.0-RC2`. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For ad

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #43: COMMONSRDF-49: Make AbstractRDFParser serializable

2017-11-13 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43 My impression is that @afs objects to the current design, but I haven't heard feedback on [my suggestion](https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43#issuecomment-341721718). --- -

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #43: COMMONSRDF-49: Make AbstractRDFParser serializable

2017-11-13 Thread wikier
Github user wikier commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43 Now that we have aborted `0.5.0-RC1`, do you think this should go in `RC2`? Honestly I have no much background to really have an opinion on this PR. --- -

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1

2017-11-13 Thread Sergio Fernández
Sorry for the extra work. RC2 will go smother ;-) On Nov 13, 2017 11:35, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Thank you for your diligence in working through the release process! :-) > > Gary > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > The vote for releasing Apache Commons RDF 0.5.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1

2017-11-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you for your diligence in working through the release process! :-) Gary On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > The vote for releasing Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1 is CANCELLED. > > In the next few days I'll prepare a new RC. > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:52 AM,

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1

2017-11-13 Thread Sergio Fernández
The vote for releasing Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1 is CANCELLED. In the next few days I'll prepare a new RC. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Can you please reply to this thread and change the subject to add > "[RESULT]" to the subject? This will close the thread. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 from RC1

2017-11-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Can you please reply to this thread and change the subject to add "[RESULT]" to the subject? This will close the thread. Gary On Nov 12, 2017 15:15, "Sergio Fernández" wrote: > Stian, I made a mistake, so we preferred to skip 0.4.0 for safety. > > About the release itself, that's reason enough