Re: [all] Deploying components

> On May 27, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On May 27, 2017 6:01 PM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote: > > Hello all, > > Benedikt and I were chatting last week about how the .tar and .zip > distributions get uploaded to nexus during "mvn deploy” and how annoying > that side effect of the depl

Re: [all] Deploying components

On May 27, 2017 6:01 PM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote: Hello all, Benedikt and I were chatting last week about how the .tar and .zip distributions get uploaded to nexus during "mvn deploy” and how annoying that side effect of the deployment happens to be. Coincidentally, I just ran across a note that M

[all] Deploying components

Hello all, Benedikt and I were chatting last week about how the .tar and .zip distributions get uploaded to nexus during "mvn deploy” and how annoying that side effect of the deployment happens to be. Coincidentally, I just ran across a note that Mladen Turk added at the end of the commons-dae

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 #177

See Changes: [chtompki] (chore) adding commons.module.name to pom -- [...truncated 29.86 KB...] [INFO] preparing 'clirr' report requires 'compile' forked phase executi

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Compress #280

See Changes: [chtompki] (chore) adding commons.module.name to the pom -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cas

Re: commons-collections - Build # 428 - Still Failing

There seems to be some issue with apache jenkins, maven 3.0/3.2, and java 1.6. This is the second (or third) time today that, on a non-consequential commit, I’ve seen the error below. Out of curiosity, how does one gain access to make job edits in Jenkins? Further, I suspect that this Jenkins

Re: [math] (chore) adding commons.module.name to pom

> On May 27, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Gilles wrote: > > Hi Rob. > > Did you read the comment written above the "componentid" properties? ;-) > [In "commons.osgi.symbolicName", "3" -> "4" would be fine.] Thanks for that set of eyes, and good point. I wasn’t thinking about that correctly when I was ma

[GitHub] commons-cli pull request #11: TRIVIAL: Adjust access-modifier of checkRequir...

Github user jdillon closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/11 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [math] (chore) adding commons.module.name to pom

Hi Rob. Did you read the comment written above the "componentid" properties? ;-) [In "commons.osgi.symbolicName", "3" -> "4" would be fine.] Regards, Gilles On Sat, 27 May 2017 14:39:37 + (UTC), chtom...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-math Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 4a3

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-beanutils #22

See Changes: [chtompki] (chore) adding commons.module.name to pom -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on beam5 (

Re: [all] Should our gitignore files contain only build-related entries?

> On May 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On May 27, 2017 7:23 AM, "Bernd Eckenfels" wrote: > > I vote for a default set optimized for build-related file but allow all > commiters to include relevant files (Specifically Editor and IDE specific). > One could set up this locally,

Re: [all] Should our gitignore files contain only build-related entries?

On May 27, 2017 7:23 AM, "Bernd Eckenfels" wrote: I vote for a default set optimized for build-related file but allow all commiters to include relevant files (Specifically Editor and IDE specific). One could set up this locally, but it is a better experience for new developers if they use common

Re: [all] Should our gitignore files contain only build-related entries?

I vote for a default set optimized for build-related file but allow all commiters to include relevant files (Specifically Editor and IDE specific). One could set up this locally, but it is a better experience for new developers if they use common tools and don't hit a dirty repo. After all a few

[collections] Uniform null-safe methods in CollectionUtils

Hi, COLLECTIONS-600 [1] received a pull request [2] to make a method in CollectionUtils null-safe. Before merging it, I decided to check what was the current approach in this class for handling null in methods. COLLECTIONS-604 [3] contains the CSV file with the methods names and current behavi

[all] Should our gitignore files contain only build-related entries?

Hi, [collections] recently received a pull request [1] to add VIM files to the gitignore file. Its currently gitignore contains only a few entries for Eclipse ([lang] has more entries for Eclipse). I remember asking something similar, and learning about the global gitignore. But besides that,