Re: [text] Deprecate CsvTranslators

+1 On May 25, 2017 1:04 AM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > I'm not talking about moving the [text] classes to [csv] but rather I want > folks to use [csv] instead of [txt]. If we have to add a few APIs here and > there fine. But I would hope that all we need is there already. > > Gary > > On Tue, May 2

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> >> > On May 24, 2017, at 2:49 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> > >> > When I build with the IBM JDK 8 that IBM includes with some Eclipse >> version >> > I have laying around, I indeed

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > On May 24, 2017, at 2:49 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > When I build with the IBM JDK 8 that IBM includes with some Eclipse > version > > I have laying around, I indeed get: > > > > java (2) > > org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateP

[All] More components (Was: [ALL] Video recordings [...])

Hi. On Tue, 23 May 2017 19:20:17 -0400, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hello Gilles, Am 23.05.2017 um 06:46 schrieb Gilles : Hi Benedikt. On Sun, 21 May 2017 19:40:28 -0400, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hi, at this year’s ApacheCON we had some nice presentations. I’d like to share the video recording

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2

> On May 24, 2017, at 2:49 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > When I build with the IBM JDK 8 that IBM includes with some Eclipse version > I have laying around, I indeed get: > > java (2) > org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateParser_TimeZoneStrategyTest > testLang1219(org.apache.commons.lang3.time.

Re: [TEXT] Proposal for StrLookup API (TEXT-80)

Hi Benedikt, >> 1. Does Maven Clirr Plugin get executed as a part of Maven install itself? > No you could either create the site with mvn site or call the clirr directly. > I recommend creating the site and looking at the report. Thanks for the guidelines. I created site with mvn site. Please

Re: [text] Deprecate CsvTranslators

I'm not talking about moving the [text] classes to [csv] but rather I want folks to use [csv] instead of [txt]. If we have to add a few APIs here and there fine. But I would hope that all we need is there already. Gary On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 23/05/2017 à 01:

Re: [imaging] Moved to git. (Was: Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move commons-imaging to git)

Hi Rob, Thank you for moving the bits! :-) Gary On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > All, > > I have moved the code (branches and tags) into the newly created > repository, and I have opened the following ticket with infra ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1422

[imaging] Moved to git. (Was: Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move commons-imaging to git)

All, I have moved the code (branches and tags) into the newly created repository, and I have opened the following ticket with infra (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14227 ) to have the mirrors re-pointed. Let me know if anyone sees

Re: [LANG][PROXY] Various utility methods dealing with proxies

Hi Yasser, Yes its on very low activity and last stable release was in 2008 but it's not dead as serviving in Commons proper and btw proxy2 is on the way not sure about release. Reviewed your code [1], seems very minimal implementation around spring aop and bit inclined towards cglib as well , I

Re: [LANG][PROXY] Various utility methods dealing with proxies

Hi again Amey, I reviewed commons proxy and found out it's last release is too old for 2008. Also it seems it's not popular; well known indexing sites like [1] just has indexed it's core module rather than other modules like javaassist and etc. (Did you mean I add my proposal as a new module n

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

On May 24, 2017 9:42 AM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote: > On May 24, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Dave Brosius wrote: > > Let's be honest, a Pair class is a bad paradigm, invented for lazyness which throws away any informative metadata. I'm not sure all of this fighting is worth it over a this. Dependency/classp

Re: [PARENT][PROPOSAL] Add Automatic-Module-Name MANIFEST entry

> On May 24, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > On 24 May 2017 at 15:55, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> We should simply add that entry, "commons.automatic-module-name," to every >> component pom’s properties section now, and then when the next parent >> migration happens, the changes w

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move commons-imaging to git

> On May 24, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 24/05/2017 à 17:18, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > >>> I suppose I’ll need PMC member help here as well. Would someone be able to >>> create a git repo for commons-imaging? I have everything cloned properly >>> from the git mirror as Em

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move commons-imaging to git

Le 24/05/2017 à 17:18, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : >> I suppose I’ll need PMC member help here as well. Would someone be able to >> create a git repo for commons-imaging? I have everything cloned properly >> from the git mirror as Emmanuel suggested, so I’m ready to begin here. I >> just need the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move commons-imaging to git

Le 24/05/2017 à 17:04, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > I suppose I’ll need PMC member help here as well. Would someone be able to > create a git repo for commons-imaging? I have everything cloned properly from > the git mirror as Emmanuel suggested, so I’m ready to begin here. I just need > the repo c

Re: [PARENT][PROPOSAL] Add Automatic-Module-Name MANIFEST entry

On 24 May 2017 at 15:55, Rob Tompkins wrote: > We should simply add that entry, "commons.automatic-module-name," to every > component pom’s properties section now, and then when the next parent > migration happens, the changes will express naturally. It might be worth > adding a comment on the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move commons-imaging to git

> On May 22, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 22/05/2017 à 14:10, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > >> Having not gone through this process before, what must I do to accomplish >> the task. My first thought is to open a jira with INFRA and go from there. >> But, I recall hearing from fo

Re: [PARENT][PROPOSAL] Add Automatic-Module-Name MANIFEST entry

> On May 23, 2017, at 7:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hi, > >> Am 22.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb sebb : >> >> On 22 May 2017 at 13:14, Rob Tompkins > > wrote: >>> On May 22, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: On 22 May 2017 at 12:51,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Text 1.1 released.

The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons Text 1.1. The Apache Commons Text open source software library provides a host of algorithms focused on working with strings and blocks of text. Source and binary distributions are available for download from the Apache

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

> On May 24, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Dave Brosius wrote: > > Let's be honest, a Pair class is a bad paradigm, invented for lazyness which > throws away any informative metadata. I'm not sure all of this fighting is > worth it over a this. Dependency/classpath discussions aside (clearly using “Pair

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

Let's be honest, a Pair class is a bad paradigm, invented for lazyness which throws away any informative metadata. I'm not sure all of this fighting is worth it over a this. On 05/24/2017 09:08 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 24/05/2017 à 13:55, Stephen Colebourne a écrit : Library A that depe

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

Le 24/05/2017 à 13:55, Stephen Colebourne a écrit : > Library A that depends on lang3 returns a Pair. > Library B that depends on lang4 takes a Pair. > Application cannot pass Pair from A to the B without conversion. That's a valid point, but the severity depends on the library. joda-time with it

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

On May 24, 2017 6:56 AM, "Stephen Colebourne" wrote: On 23 May 2017 at 17:17, sebb wrote: >> Yes, the >> code compiles and both can be on the classpath, but it is a pain to >> use, just a different kind of hell. > > I don't see what the problem is here. Library A that depends on lang3 returns a

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

On 23 May 2017 at 17:17, sebb wrote: >> Yes, the >> code compiles and both can be on the classpath, but it is a pain to >> use, just a different kind of hell. > > I don't see what the problem is here. Library A that depends on lang3 returns a Pair. Library B that depends on lang4 takes a Pair. Ap

Re: [LANG][PROXY] Various utility methods dealing with proxies

Thanks a lot! I was not aware about Apache Commons Proxy. However my proposal is not about creating proxies , but, yes I think there is a better place, thanks again. On 5/24/2017 1:57 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > +1 good idea! rather lang how about to move it to commons proxy[2] ? ATM it > have jdk,

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2

I tried with the latest IBM SDK I could find: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3280sr4fp5-20170421_01(SR4 FP5)) IBM J9 VM (build 2.8, JRE 1.8.0 Windows 10 x86-32 20170419_344392 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) J9VM - R28_20170419_1004_B344392 JIT - tr.r14.java_20170419_344392 GC - R28_20170

Re: [LANG][PROXY] Various utility methods dealing with proxies

+1 good idea! rather lang how about to move it to commons proxy[2] ? ATM it have jdk, cglib, javassist, asm4 modules we can have one more for spring as well. thoughts ? Regards, Amey [2] https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-proxy/ On Wed, May 24, 2017, 2:41 PM Yasser Zamani wrote: > Hi

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2

FTR, this is what I have: java version "1.8.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwa6480sr4-20170127_01(SR4)) IBM J9 VM (build 2.8, JRE 1.8.0 Windows 10 amd64-64 Compressed References 20170117_333500 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) J9VM - R28_20170117_0200_B333500 JIT - tr.r14.java.green_20170115

[LANG] Various utility methods dealing with proxies

Hi there, I recently had an accepted merged contribution at [1] which I prefer to remove it to Apache Commons Lang as it is common between developers. What do you think? thank you! [1] https://github.com/apache/struts/blob/master/core/src/main/java/com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/ProxyUtil.java

Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0

Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Why does every discussion at commons become a discussion about jar hell? Because it is so damn easy to create one? ;-) Cheers, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For addi

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2

Hi Gary, Gary Gregory wrote: > When I build with the IBM JDK 8 that IBM includes with some Eclipse > version I have laying around, I indeed get: > > java (2) > org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateParser_TimeZoneStrategyTest > testLang1219(org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateParser_TimeZoneS

Re: [PARENT][PROPOSAL] Add Automatic-Module-Name MANIFEST entry

Le 24/05/2017 à 01:26, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Please no more profile activation based on files being present. This is just > confusing and a dirty hack IMHO. Or maybe a profile activated by the presence of module-info.java? Emmanuel Bourg -

[GitHub] commons-collections pull request #17: small improvements for collectionUtils

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/17 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fea